Can and Should Student Be Allowed To Bring Their Devices In The Classroom
Debate Rounds (3)
For my opening statements, I would like to explain the potential benefits which having a cellular device in the classroom could have. The primary benefit is information access. This time is referred to as the information age for a reason, the information is out there. What we need to learn is how to use it. The phone in the student's pocket has access to more information that 1000 textbooks, but the students need to learn how to process and use the information within. By having the phone with them and having more exposure to the information, in theory, students can have better information literacy. The utility of the phone is also very helpful in the classroom. Students can take pictures of notes and assignments to remember them and contact their teachers to assistance. I have seen several occasions where teachers post an assignment on the board for students to write down and watched students with phones taking pictures of it to remember it. Phones are are valuable resource which our students need to practice its use.
"I will say students can bring their cell phones to school, but not in the classroom, if they are given permission to."
When a student is bringing their device to school but does not bring it in to the classroom, what purpose does the device serve? The resources present on the phone are being wasted.
"I choose no because today there are debates if students should bring it to school or not, but this majors mostly on classroom and learning topics since a lot say that students get distracted by devices or they can't learn by this or that with device in their possession. "
Why is it that a cell phone would prevent the learning process from happening? As I see it, a phone is a catalyst rather than a deterrent. I would also like to take a look at the wording used: "they CAN'T" Can't is a contraction for cannot which is suggesting that the students lose the capacity to learn because of the possession of a phone. This is a major stretch of the truth. The possession of a phone is quite the opposite and would allow the students to research information which they cannot recollect in order to allow the student to learn the information and prevent them from falling behind.
"I am saying that they can't bring in in the classroom, and they can just put in their locker until they are able to get it, and schools should tell students if they have an emergency use the phone in the school office if they need to call someone or their parents, or if they forgot their homework, project, or their stuff, come prepared, especially in high school, cause no one has chances."
1) Until it is proven that phones are a detriment to the learning environment, placing phones in a locker is a serious waste of materials which could have applications in the classroom.
2) If there is an emergency, students with phones can use a text message through their cell phones to allow rapid communication without the need to leave the class or disrupt the class in any way.
3) The occasions of homework, missing projects, or missing materials is mostly irrelevant with the exception of materials. Say for example, and English student forgets their textbooks and instead pulls up the Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet on their phone. The phone has allowed the student to supplement their phone for the missing materials in question and has proven the cell phone to be an asset to the school.
Meichan forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lord_megatron 4 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con argued that cell phones are distracting, pro argued that phones had many learning benefits and weren't detrimental to learning. Con forfeited.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.