The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Can anything with mass time travel( meaning from one point in time to another instantaneously)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/18/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 7 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 328 times Debate No: 88467
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)




In this we will be debating whether time travel is possible or not, this is purely theoretically based. unless the pro does what scientists have failed to do and prove that it is possible with hard evidence. I believe that time travel is impossible so I am the con, one reason I believe it is impossible is because if we had we would have meet someone who has traveled back in time. Yes this is an intentionally easy to debate so that we can get a smooth start. I will have better evidence as we continue.


I believe that it is theoretically possible for mass to travel through time.

To address your first claim, there are many reasons why the current population may not have met time-travelers. The most obvious possibility is that time-travellers are encouraged to dress for the time period, and not make their time-traveller status known. It is also possible that no one in the future cares enough to visit this current time period. Another possibility is that some mass can travel through time, but it is deemed too dangerous for human life. Overall, it is not logical to claim that something is theoretically impossible because there is no interpretable evidence of it.

The most promising method of traveling through time is through the use of cosmic strings. These are faults in the flow of the universe, hypothesized to be the result of the big bang. They have not been proven to exist, but it is definitely theoretically possible. These strings could be used to harness time dilation.
Debate Round No. 1


Yes it is theorized that cosmic strings could allow time travel, but the theory is that it is because moving along these strings would be the same as moving at the speed of light, it would be impossible for anything with mass to do so (assuming they exist) because the string would be shredded by the force. The reason not only life cannot move at this speed is because ANYTHING with mass would be flattened by air pressure and friction among other things. If we are talking external forces allowing us to time travel then you could also say wormholes would do the same as cosmic strings. To this I would say that for among same reasons wormholes would also fail to succeed in allowing mass to travel in time, an extra reason they would fail is due to the same as black holes all mass would additionally spaghettify all mass.


When time traveling with cosmic strings, you aren't literally on the string. The most promising idea is to fly in a figure-eight around two cosmic strings, which would not shred the strings. We could theoretically manipulate the strings to be in the ideal position for this (1). It creates a time curve. The speeds needed to benefit from this time loop would not necessarily flatten mass, especially considering this is regarding the future. We will have much more advanced technology. Regardless of the dangers involved with traveling at the speed of light (And who knows, a future civilization might redefine mass in a way that makes this possible, but probably not), you don't have to travel at the speed of light to benefit from time dilation. Cosmic strings can help us achieve time dilation more efficiently than just drifting around in space, but we do not have to be close enough to travel at the speed of light.

Debate Round No. 2


Strings aside traveling in the future or past especially could could theoretically erase some important event causing time to loop or even stop altogether. For example say you travel in time to the future and stop an assassination with no background on what was going on the person who was supposed to have died then stops what ever is allowing time travel (string or otherwise) not knowing this you travel back to your present time (able to to this because your string is in the past) there for not affected by the destroyed string in doing this the future that you cause is erased because your traveling back along a destroyed string not yet destroyed cause a loop therefore when reaching that point in time, time resets to the point in time you traveled back to. (This is assuming with future technology we would be able to destroy cosmic strings.)


You are not going to refute my reasoning for how time travel is physically possible with strings, then? Great.

The existence of paradoxes does not disprove the possibility of time travel. Everything in your example begins with a person traveling back in time, so I fail to see how it proves your point. If that happened, it would prove my point: time travel is possible.

Also, the multiple universe theory, which is theoretically possible, would allow loops like this to be resolved. There would be a universe for every possible outcome, so there is no need to circle in paradox. One universe exists as if the person did change time. One exists as if he didn't. They are both real.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by dr_sepheroth 6 months ago
Anything with mass is capable of acceleration and deceleration but for either of these effects on motion to occur you need external force.

In the case of time travel lets use star trek as an example and then explain the science.

The enterprise creates subspace bubble around itself and when entering time warp it is not just the expansion of space behind the ship and contraction of space in front of the ship, but also the inverse happens to the subspace bubble.

In Star Trek The ship is stationary while traveling faster then light as the ship warps space not light.

This is done through the Nacelles which create the subspace bubble.

In a Time Warp, as space is expanded behind the ship the subspace bubble contracts, and as space contracts in front of the ship the sub space bubble expands. The reason for the immense quantity of power required to do this is because this has to happen, more times then a star fuses hydrogen per second.

The Science behind this is just as depicted on star trek, however, while the theory is plausible, we are many centuries from time warp, as before time warp we need to full understand, how to, safely warp space to travel faster then light.

The possibility of doing this is a couple of decades away.

But to answer your question anything that Sir Isac Newtons third law of Motion can be applied too can travel through time.
Posted by ObiWan 7 months ago
Everything is always continuously travelling from one point in time to another, I think you should rework that definition of time travel.
Posted by MagicAintReal 7 months ago
Light time travels all of the time.
No votes have been placed for this debate.