Can we have sex?
Debate Rounds (3)
I do have one question; what do you mean by we?
You do not need consent to have sex, all you need is 2 humans. (E.g. rape), when I accepted this debate I thought you meant 'we' as in human race, but my position still holds true.
That is completely irrelevent to the debate and you can't change the settings of the debate in the last round. You have not contested my point, you do not need consent to have sex.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Kozu 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con doesn't explain why "we" cant have sex. Pro points out that since the both of them are people, they are physically capable of having sex. Con may not desire sexual advances, so pro probably shouldn't do so, but that doesn't detract from the fact that they 'can". So I award argument points to pro. Have fun Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.