The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
5 Points

Can we make the world completely peaceful place?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/19/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 384 times Debate No: 77859
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (1)




we can make the world peaceful without wars or conflicts, by certain attitudes which mean providing the people who are in need, we are human for god sake, we are the most intelligent creatures on this planet, we can make this world peaceful by uniting and help each other, why cant we make the world one country accepting the differences, we are not here to survive but to live peacefully forever after


I accept the debate. I will be arguing that you cannot make the world a peaceful place. I will await your opening argument, and then I shall present mine.
Debate Round No. 1


Rachid forfeited this round.


My opponent has forfeited the round and has failed to post his opening argument. I will consider what he stated in round 1 as his primary argument and will rebut it accordingly.

World peace is idealistic in nature. You state that we can make the world "peaceful without wars or conflicts" but in what sense? By your argument, we would have to exterminate everyone who society deems a "threat" to their self proclaimed peaceful basis. This will not work.

Conflict is part of human nature. There can never be a time when you can reach ultimate solidarity throughout the world, because there will always be just reason for conflict.

"We are the most intelligent creatures on this planet" - A large portion of the human population is effectively stupid. Our brain deems us to have the highest intellectual standard and allows us to have advanced cognitive measures such as complex speech and interaction. We have a higher limit on intellect then other mammals do, which makes us intelligent. However, a large portion of the human race has effectively strayed farther and farther from that limit. In comparison, an average being would be more intelligent then, a primate for example, but when you compare humans, there are many that lack proper knowledge.

You state we can make the world one country. Do you realize how massively idiotic that would be?

First, you take away sovereignty, which creates large disparities and effectively alienates every patriotic and nationalistic person.

Second, you take away pride in your nation and you force different cultures to combine. I am sure that many people, especially the ones following Islam, would have a hard time mixing with other cultures and religions, and you can see that playing out in the Middle East.

Thirdly, a government functioning with 7 billion people under its rule would fail instantly. There would be massive corruption, and it would be especially difficult to govern such a large body of people. China has a population of 1,343,000,000 people. It has massive corruption, and it is very hard to control its population, so they have to create a militarized police force.

Lastly, what kind of government would it be? A democracy? A republic? Dictatorship? Creating a voting system for 7 billion people would be tiresome. Creating a justice system would be almost impossible.

Your idea is very idealistic. It will never work, unless you suppress human nature, which will be very difficult to do.

Your last remark is the one that makes the least sense. We are here to survive, not to help each other. We are not here to work and have our property taken away for the "good of society". We are here to outlive the competition. I, for one, will not be suppressed to the point where it creates an equal basis for someone less skilled or less educated than me.

"... but to live peacefully forever after". - Effectively proves my previous remark of humans being unintelligent. To live forever after? Humans have an average life span of around 80 years, depending on region and on gender. We do not live forever, and we are in a race for survival.

I await your response.
Debate Round No. 2


Rachid forfeited this round.


Forfeiture. Vote for me!
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by TheCrookedCop 1 year ago
Kill everyone besides you, then you will have peace, besides moral peace.
Posted by MakeSensePeopleDont 1 year ago
This is an impossible notion, the entire universe is based on violence, without the violence of impacts our planet wouldn't even exist. But to keep it close to subject matter, here you go: You have a town of 1,000 people, you keep a yearly crop able to sustain 1,300 people. The past 6 months have seen an extreme cold spell with more snow than ever recorded, a freeze you have never experienced, winds howling, and storms raging ever onward. Finally the storms give way and the snow melts, you take inventory on the crops for the remaining 6 months of the year until next harvest. You find that you have enough crop to sustain 400 people for 6 months and that is stretching it to its absolute thinnest. Assume you are self-reliant and unable to request aid from outside the community. What do you do? How do you approach the problem? What do you think your citizens will do when they find out that 60% of the population at minimum will die within the next few days to sustain 40% of the population?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
the only way for war to cease, is to find peace or die
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
killing is evil
Posted by stargate 1 year ago
Yes we can, but it will have to be though force. You would need to kill those who threaten peace.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
so you go to mars to talk about Peace becasue of to much religion on earth?
Posted by Donderpants 1 year ago
And so to talk about complete peace, you go to a site designed for heated arguments......

Does that strike no one else as ironic?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
religion is separation, while self is one
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Boesball 1 year ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to con for forfeiture. Argument goes to con because pro didn't have an argument. Pro also made capitalization mistakes.