The Instigator
Scykz
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Broznik
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Categorial Issues with Problematic Obsequiousness

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Broznik
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/22/2011 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 943 times Debate No: 20023
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (4)

 

Debate Round No. 1
Debate Round No. 2
Debate Round No. 3
Debate Round No. 4
Scykz

Pro

Alright you gonna play like that then.

God
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Broznik 5 years ago
Broznik
We did this as a whimsical attempt when Scykz had the idea to battle each with one word. Just as clarification we aren't debating which word is better. We are battling each other with words. Scykz had fire, I used sand to put it out. He countered saying it was made in to glass, I used stone to break it, he used erosion to break my stone, I used roots in conjunction with the dirt from the erosion+stone, he used gophers to eat my roots, I used flood to drown his gophers, he gave up in futility resorted to god xP, and I combated god with science =).
Posted by MasterKage 5 years ago
MasterKage
Round 1: Pro
Fire can be effective in many situations, while sand in much less.

Round 2: Con
Many things can be built with stone ( Arrows heads, caskets, ect.)

Round 3: Pro
Erosion can sweep items from their original locations; I'm unsure how roots even contest erosion.

Round 4: Con
Floods destroy things viciously, while gophers don't make much of a threat.

Round 5: Con
Science explains far more things than God does.

Wins
Pro: 2
Con: 3

Winner: Con
Posted by Glerpknox 5 years ago
Glerpknox
This debate pleases me.
Posted by Scykz 5 years ago
Scykz
Oops wrong title! Meant to be one word debate!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Kinesis 5 years ago
Kinesis
ScykzBroznikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Science > God.
Vote Placed by Rockylightning 5 years ago
Rockylightning
ScykzBroznikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Clever.
Vote Placed by MasterKage 5 years ago
MasterKage
ScykzBroznikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: RFD in comments.
Vote Placed by cameronl35 5 years ago
cameronl35
ScykzBroznikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con countered everything cleverly