The Instigator
imabench
Pro (for)
Tied
6 Points
The Contender
xXCryptoXx
Con (against)
Tied
6 Points

*Censored by Moderator*

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/18/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,985 times Debate No: 36666
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (3)

 

imabench

Pro

I am arguing that the level of censorship of DDO done by moderators is far too *Censored by Moderator* to the point that people dont even know what youre talking about anymore since the moderators are so *Censored by Moderator* with the censoring....

Like just the other day I wanted to make a debate called *Censored by Moderator* and the debate hadnt even been open for *Censored by Moderator* minutes before *Censored by Moderator* came in and shut it down! The debate wasnt even that bad either, it was actually meant to be a humorous discussion about why God would be ok with shoving a *Censored by Moderator* up your *Censored by Moderator* on an airplane when you are waiting to take off!....

And this isnt just about censoring debates either. Whenever Im in the forums or the opinions section, Im always being *Censored by Moderator* up my *Censored by Moderator* by the *Censored by Moderator* over some of my word choice and over who I talk badly about, like *Censored by Moderator*, *Censored by Moderator*, or even *Censored by Moderator*

This is an issue that everyone puts up with too, not just me. Just recently a member on the home forums got in a fight with *Censored by Moderator*, and just because *Censored by Moderator* is really good friends with the moderators, the moderators came in and censored everything that was said against him. Even harmless insults like *Censored by Moderator* and *Censored by Moderator* were *Censored by Moderator* just because they were said towards a particular person who is good friends with the Moderators on the site. They even went to censor the name of the person being insulted just to protect his image, even though *Censored by Moderator* doesnt really have a good image on the site to begin with.....

Whats worse is that whenever someone speaks up about how *Censored by Moderator* and *Censored by Moderator* the censoring has gotten on the site, that person puts themselves in grave danger of being *Censored by Moderator* from the site for life simply because they spoke out about all the *Censored by Moderator* !

So basically, *Censored by Moderator* has become so *Censored by Moderator* and *Censored by Moderator* that I argue they should scale back their efforts at censoring everything from controversial debates to the use of very harmless insulting language such as *Censored by Moderator*
xXCryptoXx

Con


*Censored by Moderator*

I would like to thank Imabench for instigating this debate.

I will be arguing that moderators do a fine job in censoring us and that it is needed for the overall efficiency of DDO.


THIS IS A DICTATORSHIP. JUGGLE IS OUR LEADER. MODERATORS ARE HIS HENCHMEN. HE DOES WHAT HE WANTS, AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT THEN THEY'LL SEND IN JIMMY. YOU DON'T WANT A VISIT FROM JIMMY.

Guys I'm being held at gunpoint by Jimmy as I type this. Help.

On to my main arguments now!


*Censored by Moderator*


*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*



*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*



*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by



*Censored by Moderator*


*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by


*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*
ator*
*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*



*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*


*Censored by Moderator*


*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*

Conlusion


*Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*

Sources

1. *Censored by Moderator*
2.
*Censored by Moderator*
3.
*Censored by Moderator*

Debate Round No. 1
imabench

Pro

Ok this is just getting ridiculous.... Allow me to go ahead and get this debate back on track after being derailed by con's antics....

*Censored by Moderator*

" *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator* "

Thats just idiotic because *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*

" *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator* "

I can see how one could make that assumption based off of that observation, but you must remember that *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*, which defeats the initial argument

*Censored by Moderator*

Now in this argument, con claims that *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*

However, con's own previous claim that *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator* completely contradicts the argument since *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator* which renders this argument pointless since it is completely contradictory to the fact that *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*

Conclusion:

In conclusion, *Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator**Censored by Moderator*

Sources:

*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*
*Censored by Moderator*

Debate Round No. 2
imabench

Pro

*Censored by Moderator*
xXCryptoXx

Con

Damnit Imabench we can't censor videos!

Heheh, either way though, you'll still be getting a visit from Jimmy soon.

NO ONE SAW THIS DEBATE.

IF ANYONE MAKES IT APPARENT THAT THEY HAVE VIEWED THIS DEBATE I WILL FVCKING CRUSH YOU.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by xXCryptoXx 3 years ago
xXCryptoXx
I think this debate may be one of DDO's best political statements about DDO ever.
Posted by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
If you don't like juggle's actions, you get a visit from Jimmy.
Hey Juggle, I hate you!
...
I'm waiting for Jimmy.
Posted by Weiler 3 years ago
Weiler
I laughed my butt off reading this debate. It speaks volumes to both of your......... hang on, somebody is in my doorway....... Oh Sh!t, it's Jimmy!!!!! Somebody call the police!!!! He has a knife!!!! Please, you've gotta help msdfhil;ff fd

dfh
gh34y
yjhizsrthuio
Posted by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
Debate #36666.

imabench is the devil. Case closed.
Posted by Sargon 3 years ago
Sargon
I'm thinking of voting for Pro because he has more sources.
Posted by Bullish 3 years ago
Bullish
*censored by Moderator* !!
Posted by xXCryptoXx 3 years ago
xXCryptoXx
Imabench, if I don't respond assume I am dead.

Also, they'll be after you next.

Tell my wife I love her.
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Duncan just recorded the biggest fail in DDO history...
Posted by Stephen_Hawkins 3 years ago
Stephen_Hawkins
That reaction deserves money.
Posted by Duncan 3 years ago
Duncan
Or, you could just change a %#*"ing word by one letter, you dumb a$$hole.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
imabenchxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: What in the shitpiss is censorship?
Vote Placed by TheAntidoter 3 years ago
TheAntidoter
imabenchxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Imabench did not *Censored by moderator* The *Censored by moderator* about jimmy, and so the points for *Censored by moderator* go to con. Pro Did mention a reputable *Censored by moderator* and also *Censored by moderator* it with *Censored by moderator*. The *Censored by moderator* goes to Pro because *Censored by moderator* did not change the *Censored by moderator* size between the 1st and 2nd rounds. Both people were in *Censored by moderator* Conduct compared to *Censored by moderator* HAIL JUGGLE!
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
imabenchxXCryptoXxTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I think that Imabench *Censored by Moderator*, which was very impressive considering *Censored by Moderator*. It is very *Censored by Moderator* that *Censored by Moderator* and *Censored by Moderator*. If *Censored by Moderator*, then we conclude that *Censored by Moderator*. So there.