The Instigator
MusicPerson
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
PanderGaming
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Censorship of music

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
PanderGaming
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/1/2015 Category: Music
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 813 times Debate No: 72737
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

MusicPerson

Pro

Should music be censored to kids?
PanderGaming

Con

The censorship of music should not be brought, Because according to the website "http://www.dailymail.co.uk...; music can help with back pain, improve your exercise, and brings memory back.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by really12 2 years ago
really12
Well, there already is censorship in music, music videos aired on television are a good example as they always omit expletives from them and other themes. Likewise, with parental guidance stickers on album covers.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by EAT_IT_SUKA 2 years ago
EAT_IT_SUKA
MusicPersonPanderGamingTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was just ridiculous. There were no insults or forfeits, so therefore, no better conduct points are awarded to PRO nor CON. CON capitalized his 'b' in 'because,' and there was no reason for that, whereas PRO had no spelling errors, so therefore, points are awarded to PRO for better grammar. PRO didn't even argue, whereas CON made some arguments, therefore, CON receives points for convincing arguments. CON had a link that was relevant to their arguments, and PRO didn't use links, so therefore, points are awarded to CON for reliable links. Why was this debate one round anyway?
Vote Placed by Sashil 2 years ago
Sashil
MusicPersonPanderGamingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: The number of LQ debates in this site these days is just astounding >_<