The Instigator
Kumquatodor
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Rational_Thinker9119
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Charlie Sheen (with prep) VS Chuck Norris

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Kumquatodor
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/22/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,248 times Debate No: 34979
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

Kumquatodor

Pro

Though substantially less awesome normally, I believe that Charlie Sheen, with a week of preparation, would beat unsuspecting Chuck Norris in a fight to the death.

Definitions
Charlie Sheen: the man who was WINNING two years ago (except for that short stint of bi-winning).
Chuck Norris: Chuck Norris
Fight: A violent, physical struggle.


Round 1: Acceptance
Round 2: Arguments (aka the part where I start winning)
Round 3: Arguments/Rebuttals (aka the part where I continue to win)
Round 4: Arguments/Rebuttals (aka where I win)
Round 5: Conclusions (aka where I look back and say "Wow, winning!)


Seeing as both these people are deities, I almost put this debate under the "religious" category. However,I didn't because Llama-Lord probably won't show up to this debate.
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

I accept. Present your case.
Debate Round No. 1
Kumquatodor

Pro

Charlie Sheen has a variety of superpowers listed below.

Adaptation - Charlie Sheen adapts well to attacks.

Animal Attributes - "Tiger blood"

Clairvoyance - He knows what his enemies are doing

Cross-Dimensional Travel - "Perhaps, my brain is not from this particular terrestrial realm."

Endurance - Been around since the late 70s

Energy Blasts - He can blast star power

Enhanced Memory - He remembers the 70s. (The 80s are a blur though)

Fire Resistance - He has firey passion. He an resist this fire.

Force Fields - Tiger Blood. Your argument is invalid.

Healing Factor - "I thought it, and in a nanosecond I cured my brain">

Heat Generation - His anger.

Heat Resistance - He can resist his anger

Human physical perfection - Charlie Sheen

Illusions - He makes them. Some think that only he can see them

Immortality - "Death is for for fools".

Insanity - some argue.

Intelligence - His brain is extra dimensionally extraterrestrial.

Invisibility - Used from 1990-2010

Invulnerability - Adonis DNA grants this

Latent Abilities - He's a nice guy until you mess with his family. "I will defend them with a violent passion.

Longevity - Adonis DNA

Magic - "Defeat is not an option. They picked a fight with a warlock." and "I'm rollin' out magic, bro."

Magic Resistance - Warlock

Omnilingualism - His movies can be dubbed in any language

Power Nullifying - Winning!

Radiation Immunity - He is immune to star power

Reality Warping - He thinks it, and it is. Until 2011, you could only win. Now, you can bi-win.

Reflexes - He responds quickly

Resurrection - He came back in 2010

Stamina - Most people would drop dead from his life.

Stealth - He sneaks into the spotlight

Cyberpath - He has a Youtube channel.

Time Travel - Ever time he watches Platoon. He ones got stuck in 1985.

Time Vision - He sees the 80s as the present.

Toxin and Disease Resistance - Resist the affects of the drug "Charlie Sheen" "If you try it once, you will die. Your face'll melt off and your children will weep over your exploded body."

X-Ray Vision - He sees your lies

Wishing - He thinks, therefore it is.

Charlie Sheen can also do anything. If you say he can't, you must remember "Can't is the cancer of happen!"

He will beat Chuck with these powers.

I am winning!


Rational_Thinker9119

Con

All of my opponent's arguments were bare-assertions, accompanied by quotes made by Charlie Sheen himself, who most likely is not telling the truth. However, Chuck Norris invented the idea of "truth". Therefore, you can bet you bottom dollar that everything I am saying is true. If you think that is a non-sequitur, just remember, Chuck Norris is logic itself.

Divinity

Jesus prays to chuck norris



Proof Of Fightning Skills

Chuck Norris actually has moves (Check Video)


Chuck Norris Is Not A Drug Addict

Charlie Sheen is a drug addict, and this would hinder any abilities my opponent claims he may have. Just look at this mess of a man:



Chuck Norris Is Old

Chuck is in his 70's, this means he is closer to God than Charlie because God is the oldest person there is. This alone would not give him extra powers, but he is Chuck Norris.

Conclusion

Jesus prays to Chuck Norris, and Chuck Norris is devine. There is evidence that Chuck can actually fight, there is no evidence that sheen can actually fight. Charlie Sheen is also a drug addict, and probably said all the things my opponent quoted while he was high on cocaine. Chuck norris is also closer to God, and God gives him powers to overcome Sheen because of this? Why? Because he is Chuck Norris.

I win. Why? Well, my friend Chuck has something to say...



Debate Round No. 2
Kumquatodor

Pro

I can tell you that Charlie Sheen is telling the truth about everything because Charlie Sheen SAID so.
Chuck Norris invented the idea of "truth".
This is inaccurate; he invented the idea of a "lie". It sounded like "die".
Jesus prays to chuck norris
Charlie Sheen has the DNA of a god. Adonis DNA. Adonis is beautiful... So beautiful...
Chuck Norris actually has moves
Chuck's moves don't affect Sheen; Sheen is a warlock!
Charlie Sheen is a drug addict
No he isn't; he said so. That cigarret he's holding is for show! It is to inspire children to do good things in the world! Also, he looked AWESOME! I wish I looked that happy!
Chuck Norris Is Old
Charlie Sheen is fairly old. He has to be at least 45. Also, how many near-overdoses has Sheen had? Millions more than Norris!

What Chuck says is irrelivant to thanks to one immortal phrase:

"I'm Bi-Winning!"
My argument is that your argument about my argument being in valid is invalid!

"Wow, winning!"
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

My opponent's last round was more or less just a bunch of nonsense. In reality, Chuck is a black belt and would whoop Charlie Sheen's drug addict a*s any day of the weak.

Case closed.
Debate Round No. 3
Kumquatodor

Pro

My opponent's last round was more or less just a bunch of nonsense.
How so?

Chuck is a black belt
This is true, but is irrelevant. After Charlie Sheen is done, Chuck will be a black-and-blue (with splashes of red) belt-wearer.

Also, Charlie Sheen ccan buy a gun!

would whoop Charlie Sheen's drug addict a*s any day of the weak.
But Charlie Sheen doesn't use days of the weak. He uses the days of the strong. Chuck Norris cannot beat Sheen any day of the strong!



Drug Addiction
My opponent continuously claims that Sheen is a drug addict. The fact is, Sheen said he wasn't an addict. This is proof that he isn't.

My opponent has yet to show why we cannot trust Sheen.


My opponent claims that the case is closed. He right. I HAVE WON!
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

"How so?"

You are just making up a bunch of things.

"This is true, but is irrelevant. After Charlie Sheen is done, Chuck will be a black-and-blue (with splashes of red) belt-wearer."

There is nothing to support my opponent's above assertion. Chuck would probably win the fight, as he has been a professional martial artist for years. Charie is a drug addict.

"But Charlie Sheen doesn't use days of the weak. He uses the days of the strong. Chuck Norris cannot beat Sheen any day of the strong!"

I meant week. There, problem solved.

"My opponent continuously claims that Sheen is a drug addict. The fact is, Sheen said he wasn't an addict. This is proof that he isn't."

Charlie definitely said "I was banging 7 gram rocks, that's how I roll".

"My opponent has yet to show why we cannot trust Sheen."

I did show why. He does cocaine and crack.

"My opponent claims that the case is closed. He right. I HAVE WON!"

Impossible, as you are backing a drug addict. I am backing a black belt. I self-evidently win.

Charlie Sheen is LOOOOSSSIIINNNGG
Debate Round No. 4
Kumquatodor

Pro

This has come to an end.

I have shown that Charlie Sheen has various superhuman attributes.
I have shown that Chuck Norris created lies because they sounded like "dies."
I have shown that Charlie Sheen is closer to God due to his near-death experiences.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen is not a drug addict because Sheen said so.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen is part God because of his Adonis DNA.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen's magic stops any "moves" from Chuck Norris.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen inspires kids to do good.
I have shown that, with a gun/tiger-blood, Chuck would die.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen uses days of the strong.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen should be trusted due to his awesomeness.

Good luck. May Llama-Lord spit on us all.
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

Lets be real, Pro is just making up a bunch of crap (as I was too in the beginning, but let's get down to business). Charie is/ was actually a junkie, who smokes. Chuck Norris is an esteemed martial artist with a black belt. This debate is worthless. Obviouly Chuck Norris would kick this junkie's as*. Case Closed.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Rational_Thinker9119
Kumquatodor, don't you get it? Chuck Norris was showing him mercy by letting him live in the end, you confuse the war with the battle....Think about it.
Posted by Kumquatodor 3 years ago
Kumquatodor
Llama-Lord shall protect me.

BTW, Bruce Lee fought Chuck in Return of the Dragon and won! WHERES YOUR NORRIS NOW?!?!
Posted by Fictional-Reality 3 years ago
Fictional-Reality
Hath someone DARE even TRY and raise query against the almighty that be-ith the deity himself?!?!?
Forgive him O Chuck Norris for he knowith not what he do!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by larztheloser 3 years ago
larztheloser
KumquatodorRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: OK debate for both sides. Both sides made cases backed only by assertions, and both sides would have benefitted by not doing that. Both sides made really impressive assertions, but almost all the rebuttal focused on con's material. This allowed pro to have enough of a narrative to meet their burden of proof to show Charlie Sheen is sufficiently awesome to beat Chuck Norris. More structured, prose-based cases are usually easier to read and judge as well.