Charlie Sheen (with prep) VS Chuck Norris
Though substantially less awesome normally, I believe that Charlie Sheen, with a week of preparation, would beat unsuspecting Chuck Norris in a fight to the death.
Charlie Sheen: the man who was WINNING two years ago (except for that short stint of bi-winning).
Chuck Norris: Chuck Norris
Fight: A violent, physical struggle.
Round 1: Acceptance
Round 2: Arguments (aka the part where I start winning)
Round 3: Arguments/Rebuttals (aka the part where I continue to win)
Round 4: Arguments/Rebuttals (aka where I win)
Round 5: Conclusions (aka where I look back and say "Wow, winning!)
Seeing as both these people are deities, I almost put this debate under the "religious" category. However,I didn't because Llama-Lord probably won't show up to this debate.
I accept. Present your case.
Charlie Sheen has a variety of superpowers listed below.
Adaptation - Charlie Sheen adapts well to attacks.
Animal Attributes - "Tiger blood"
Clairvoyance - He knows what his enemies are doing
Cross-Dimensional Travel - "Perhaps, my brain is not from this particular terrestrial realm."
Endurance - Been around since the late 70s
Energy Blasts - He can blast star power
Enhanced Memory - He remembers the 70s. (The 80s are a blur though)
Fire Resistance - He has firey passion. He an resist this fire.
Force Fields - Tiger Blood. Your argument is invalid.
Healing Factor - "I thought it, and in a nanosecond I cured my brain">
Heat Generation - His anger.
Heat Resistance - He can resist his anger
Human physical perfection - Charlie Sheen
Illusions - He makes them. Some think that only he can see them
Immortality - "Death is for for fools".
Insanity - some argue.
Intelligence - His brain is extra dimensionally extraterrestrial.
Invisibility - Used from 1990-2010
Invulnerability - Adonis DNA grants this
Latent Abilities - He's a nice guy until you mess with his family. "I will defend them with a violent passion.
Longevity - Adonis DNA
Magic - "Defeat is not an option. They picked a fight with a warlock." and "I'm rollin' out magic, bro."
Magic Resistance - Warlock
Omnilingualism - His movies can be dubbed in any language
Power Nullifying - Winning!
Radiation Immunity - He is immune to star power
Reality Warping - He thinks it, and it is. Until 2011, you could only win. Now, you can bi-win.
Reflexes - He responds quickly
Resurrection - He came back in 2010
Stamina - Most people would drop dead from his life.
Stealth - He sneaks into the spotlight
Cyberpath - He has a Youtube channel.
Time Travel - Ever time he watches Platoon. He ones got stuck in 1985.
Time Vision - He sees the 80s as the present.
Toxin and Disease Resistance - Resist the affects of the drug "Charlie Sheen" "If you try it once, you will die. Your face'll melt off and your children will weep over your exploded body."
X-Ray Vision - He sees your lies
Wishing - He thinks, therefore it is.
All of my opponent's arguments were bare-assertions, accompanied by quotes made by Charlie Sheen himself, who most likely is not telling the truth. However, Chuck Norris invented the idea of "truth". Therefore, you can bet you bottom dollar that everything I am saying is true. If you think that is a non-sequitur, just remember, Chuck Norris is logic itself.
Jesus prays to chuck norris
Proof Of Fightning Skills
Chuck Norris actually has moves (Check Video)
Chuck Norris Is Not A Drug Addict
Charlie Sheen is a drug addict, and this would hinder any abilities my opponent claims he may have. Just look at this mess of a man:
Chuck Norris Is Old
Chuck is in his 70's, this means he is closer to God than Charlie because God is the oldest person there is. This alone would not give him extra powers, but he is Chuck Norris.
Jesus prays to Chuck Norris, and Chuck Norris is devine. There is evidence that Chuck can actually fight, there is no evidence that sheen can actually fight. Charlie Sheen is also a drug addict, and probably said all the things my opponent quoted while he was high on cocaine. Chuck norris is also closer to God, and God gives him powers to overcome Sheen because of this? Why? Because he is Chuck Norris.
I win. Why? Well, my friend Chuck has something to say...
I can tell you that Charlie Sheen is telling the truth about everything because Charlie Sheen SAID so.
Chuck Norris invented the idea of "truth".
This is inaccurate; he invented the idea of a "lie". It sounded like "die".
Jesus prays to chuck norris
Charlie Sheen has the DNA of a god. Adonis DNA. Adonis is beautiful... So beautiful...
Chuck Norris actually has moves
Chuck's moves don't affect Sheen; Sheen is a warlock!
Charlie Sheen is a drug addict
No he isn't; he said so. That cigarret he's holding is for show! It is to inspire children to do good things in the world! Also, he looked AWESOME! I wish I looked that happy!
Chuck Norris Is Old
Charlie Sheen is fairly old. He has to be at least 45. Also, how many near-overdoses has Sheen had? Millions more than Norris!
What Chuck says is irrelivant to thanks to one immortal phrase:
My argument is that your argument about my argument being in valid is invalid!
My opponent's last round was more or less just a bunch of nonsense. In reality, Chuck is a black belt and would whoop Charlie Sheen's drug addict a*s any day of the weak.
My opponent's last round was more or less just a bunch of nonsense.
Chuck is a black belt
This is true, but is irrelevant. After Charlie Sheen is done, Chuck will be a black-and-blue (with splashes of red) belt-wearer.
Also, Charlie Sheen ccan buy a gun!
would whoop Charlie Sheen's drug addict a*s any day of the weak.
But Charlie Sheen doesn't use days of the weak. He uses the days of the strong. Chuck Norris cannot beat Sheen any day of the strong!
My opponent continuously claims that Sheen is a drug addict. The fact is, Sheen said he wasn't an addict. This is proof that he isn't.
My opponent has yet to show why we cannot trust Sheen.
My opponent claims that the case is closed. He right. I HAVE WON!
You are just making up a bunch of things.
"This is true, but is irrelevant. After Charlie Sheen is done, Chuck will be a black-and-blue (with splashes of red) belt-wearer."
There is nothing to support my opponent's above assertion. Chuck would probably win the fight, as he has been a professional martial artist for years. Charie is a drug addict.
"But Charlie Sheen doesn't use days of the weak. He uses the days of the strong. Chuck Norris cannot beat Sheen any day of the strong!"
I meant week. There, problem solved.
"My opponent continuously claims that Sheen is a drug addict. The fact is, Sheen said he wasn't an addict. This is proof that he isn't."
Charlie definitely said "I was banging 7 gram rocks, that's how I roll".
"My opponent has yet to show why we cannot trust Sheen."
I did show why. He does cocaine and crack.
"My opponent claims that the case is closed. He right. I HAVE WON!"
Impossible, as you are backing a drug addict. I am backing a black belt. I self-evidently win.
Charlie Sheen is LOOOOSSSIIINNNGG
This has come to an end.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen has various superhuman attributes.
I have shown that Chuck Norris created lies because they sounded like "dies."
I have shown that Charlie Sheen is closer to God due to his near-death experiences.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen is not a drug addict because Sheen said so.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen is part God because of his Adonis DNA.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen's magic stops any "moves" from Chuck Norris.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen inspires kids to do good.
I have shown that, with a gun/tiger-blood, Chuck would die.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen uses days of the strong.
I have shown that Charlie Sheen should be trusted due to his awesomeness.
Good luck. May Llama-Lord spit on us all.
Lets be real, Pro is just making up a bunch of crap (as I was too in the beginning, but let's get down to business). Charie is/ was actually a junkie, who smokes. Chuck Norris is an esteemed martial artist with a black belt. This debate is worthless. Obviouly Chuck Norris would kick this junkie's as*. Case Closed.
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|