The Instigator
sandun
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Sidnix111
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Chemistry is the worst enemy of environment

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/7/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,194 times Debate No: 69589
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)

 

sandun

Con

Environment is a combination of biological phenomenon,chemical consequences,applied mathematics and physics.so saying chemistry is the worst enemy not acceptable.
Sidnix111

Pro

Chemistry is not exactly the worst enemy of the environment. Its actually not at all an enemy, we ( the humans) have made it into one. Plastic, which is one of the leading causes of global warming was invented by chemistry. In fact behind every cause of global warming, there is some kind of chemistry behind it. Anything that not natural is considered bad for the environment and what can be more unnatural than chemicals???
Debate Round No. 1
sandun

Con

sandun forfeited this round.
Sidnix111

Pro

Due to chemistry, we have learnt about and also discovered new elements, some of which are helpful to mankind and some which that aren't. The impact of the life threatening chemicals is much more than that of the ones that help us. For example uranium causes high level of radiation, which effect cannot be reversed by any other element. You want chemicals?? How about hydrochloric or sulphuric acid, which cause SOME damage. Chemicals are continuously and irreversibly damaging the earth. It's ripping a hole in the ozone. Well, chemistry isn't. We are. But I still believe that we would have been better off without this much development of science or chemistry.
Debate Round No. 2
sandun

Con

sandun forfeited this round.
Sidnix111

Pro

Sidnix111 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
sandun

Con

sandun forfeited this round.
Sidnix111

Pro

Sidnix111 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
sandun

Con

sandun forfeited this round.
Sidnix111

Pro

Sidnix111 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by dullagamur 2 years ago
dullagamur
This is unwinable
Posted by Network 2 years ago
Network
This is a troll debate. Pro can't win unless Con forfeits.
Posted by Proving_a_Negative 2 years ago
Proving_a_Negative
indeed. Plus it is rather subjective to say that anything is "bad" or "good" for the environment. Perhaps if we do build an ozone layer near the due to pollution it would be a good thing. It wound render life impossible on this planet, but life without humans messing everything up might be a good thing for the environment.
Posted by DDDDaniel 2 years ago
DDDDaniel
This seems like a resolution highly weighted toward the CON side. It would be nearly impossible to prove the PRO.
No votes have been placed for this debate.