The Instigator
19104838
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
baus
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points

Child abuse

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
baus
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/30/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 833 times Debate No: 55754
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (1)

 

19104838

Con

Child abuse is wrong and sad. everyday I turn on the news before I go to school(dad does)
and there again child abuser goes to jail for so many years and I think its sick, wrong, and just disccusting to see a fricken 5 year old beaten to her or his death.
baus

Pro

"Child abuse is wrong and sad." is a baseless claim based on zero evidence whatsoever.

"I think its sick, wrong, and just disgusting to see a 5 year-old beaten to his/her death." That's seriously disrespectful to the 5 year old that have died in the name of making that video. Do you think they chose to be so disgusting?


I support child abuse because it assists natural selection.
Debate Round No. 1
19104838

Con

19104838 forfeited this round.
baus

Pro

Children must be abused so they don't grow up to make this song:
Debate Round No. 2
19104838

Con

19104838 forfeited this round.
baus

Pro

baus forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by schachdame 2 years ago
schachdame
Oh look, I was right. You really have to find the dark spots in you to go for Pro
Posted by Daltonian 2 years ago
Daltonian
.. who would be pro-child abuse?
Posted by schachdame 2 years ago
schachdame
Usually I would not mind if someone takes a not-controversial statement and shows a hypothetically controversial side on it. But the challenger is clearly of very young age or young in mind. And while I think everyone should debate freely even against his morals, I'd say debating this challenger is morally controversial itself.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
I'm tempted to run metaethical moral relativism, but I don't want to be that person XD
Posted by Cold-Mind 2 years ago
Cold-Mind
@Burncastle @queenofmayhem
There are several people who like to take position in defending ludicrous statements recently.
Posted by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
Change the argument period to 24 hours and I will accept this debate.
Posted by Burncastle 2 years ago
Burncastle
Did you honestly think anyone would challenge you on that?
Posted by queenofmayhem 2 years ago
queenofmayhem
I recommend you propose a debate where not everyone agrees with you.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Cobo 2 years ago
Cobo
19104838bausTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Two rounds forfeited vs One round forfeit