Children with younger siblings should have 10x more respect and authority then their sibilings
Debate Rounds (5)
GeorgiaAshley this is a debate to be hard for you
because you have 2 younger sibling one who is not the essence of obedience
GOOD LUCK :)
Sure seniority plays a big part in life but as a family, we siblings should have the same respect and authority as each other.
I am speaking for all those "middle" children out there, not the strict bossy ones, not the spoiled pampered ones, but the humble middle children.
Just because we are second (or in some cases even further down) in the pecking order does not mean that we do not deserve respect from our other siblings.
I actually am also a half humble middle child but I know that their perks from being a little higher up, for example
Middle children: they will give respect as they know what your feeling is to be the one being bossed around or giving orders
Youngest the baby and to prove in my opinion that the youngest are unusually spoilt and are used to having everything done for them. some giving respect to older children teaches younger children to respect older human being just as being the oldest come more and more responsibility as new baby brothers and sisters.
yes I do however agree with a reason that the youngest should a perk of giving respect earns respect
(thank you for excepting my topic)
I don't understand which side you are on ,you seem to be agreeing with my statements as a pose to refuting them?
I agree that there should be the point to the younger children that respect earns respect and then earning more authuroity as they grow older
Pinkprincess forfeited this round.
I thank you for this arguement
Pity i missed round4
So, after exploring both sides of this debate I have come to the conclusion that children with younger siblings should not have 10x more respect and authority then their younger siblings.
I am not going to give any reasons of why, if you are however curious just scroll on up to see my previous arguments.
I think you should vote for me (CON) because I put out several meaningful arguments.
I used good grammar and spelling throughout this debate.
My arguments proposed were relevant and came from reliable sources.
I did not forfeit any rounds whatsoever.
I kept true to my opinion unlike PRO.
Voters please vote for me, thank you for your time.
Thank you PRO. :)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by wrichcirw 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: see comment
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.