The Instigator
AnnaCarla
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
1dustpelt
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points

China's economic Growth

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
1dustpelt
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/18/2012 Category: Economics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,322 times Debate No: 22947
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

AnnaCarla

Con

has China become to rich?
1dustpelt

Pro

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
AnnaCarla

Con

AnnaCarla forfeited this round.
1dustpelt

Pro

Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 2
AnnaCarla

Con

AnnaCarla forfeited this round.
1dustpelt

Pro

Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 3
AnnaCarla

Con

AnnaCarla forfeited this round.
1dustpelt

Pro

I ask for conduct points.
Debate Round No. 4
AnnaCarla

Con

AnnaCarla forfeited this round.
1dustpelt

Pro

KFC does not have feathers in it's chicken.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by RoyLatham 5 years ago
RoyLatham
What is the resolution? If the resolution is "China has become too rich." then the Con position is so obviously true that it isn't a debatable topic. there are good debatable topics about whether china is headed for a crash or how long growth can be sustained. With the resolution so poorly stated, this invites a semantic play.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
AnnaCarla1dustpeltTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO, find a real debate :P