The Instigator
Warren181
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
GarretKadeDupre
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Christainity is true.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Warren181
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/7/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 507 times Debate No: 48630
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

Warren181

Pro

I invite Garret but do not be offended by my awesome comebacks.
GarretKadeDupre

Con

As Con, I will argue that "Christainity" is false.

"Christainity": The idea that 1+1=3.
Debate Round No. 1
Warren181

Pro

Christianity is true. The Bible is true. I know because I have had a vision of Heaven. My Grandmother had Cancer 3 times and survived. Miracles do happen.
GarretKadeDupre

Con

GarretKadeDupre forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Warren181

Pro

Warren181 forfeited this round.
GarretKadeDupre

Con

GarretKadeDupre forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Warren181

Pro

Warren181 forfeited this round.
GarretKadeDupre

Con

GarretKadeDupre forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Warren181

Pro

Warren181 forfeited this round.
GarretKadeDupre

Con

GarretKadeDupre forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Jabuticaba 3 years ago
Jabuticaba
This is a lie. You only have cancer once, not 3 times.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by PiercedPanda 3 years ago
PiercedPanda
Warren181GarretKadeDupreTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Though his argument were horrible, pro was the only one who presented one, giving him points for arguments. Con forfeited first, so pro get's points for conduct.
Vote Placed by progressivedem22 3 years ago
progressivedem22
Warren181GarretKadeDupreTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF