The Instigator
godsnumberis7
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
macheteenima
Con (against)
Losing
2 Points

Christianity vs Atheism

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
godsnumberis7
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/16/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 416 times Debate No: 54869
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (4)

 

godsnumberis7

Pro

1st round is for acceptance
2nd main point
3rd rebuttal
4th rebuttal and closing
macheteenima

Con

I accept you debate
Debate Round No. 1
godsnumberis7

Pro

If you don't believe in a god then tell me this, how is it that Earth is placed in such a perfect and protected from the rays and stuff and also you can look at how complex the human body is.
macheteenima

Con

the position of the planet that makes it optimized for life is merely coincidental. The functions of the human body have perfected in billions of years of natural selection. The adaptations that we best suited for survival were passed on because the individual who had them were able to live long enough to reproduce.
Debate Round No. 2
godsnumberis7

Pro

O.K. first of all I said 2nd round is for main points, not rebuttal and second of all the chances that the planet was here being coincidental is like 1 in a million and what proof do you have that the human body was perfected in billions of years of natural selection.
macheteenima

Con

macheteenima forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
godsnumberis7

Pro

go head whats your argument
macheteenima

Con

macheteenima forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Sagey 2 years ago
Sagey
True, I know of a couple of 11 year old children who could defeat Pro's argument easily.
Posted by SNP1 2 years ago
SNP1
Wow... Pro, what a weak argument... I won't respond yet, in order to keep the debate fair, but that argument is one of the weakest I have seen.
Posted by billysquirrel1 2 years ago
billysquirrel1
@lightningbolt50, seing howgodsnumberis7 has an angel profile pic, it's safe to assume he's pro creation.
Posted by lightingbolt50 2 years ago
lightingbolt50
Wait, is pro for Christianity or atheism? This should've been clarified.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Sagey 2 years ago
Sagey
godsnumberis7macheteenimaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con could have tried and it is possibly a winning argument position, but whatever happened is beyond moi. So Pro gets both the debate and the better conduct point. :-( 2 many debates end this way???
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
godsnumberis7macheteenimaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF. Low quality.
Vote Placed by numberwang 2 years ago
numberwang
godsnumberis7macheteenimaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to offer any proof of what he said and used R3 just to ask questions and since Con did not offer any evidence for his argument neither of them had convincing arguments. Con had better grammar and pro had better conduct for not quitting.
Vote Placed by baus 2 years ago
baus
godsnumberis7macheteenimaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's R3 had no capitalization or question mark whereas con's only grammatical error was in R2. FF