The Instigator
Jman0056
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Teemo
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points

Chuck Norris is real

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Teemo
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/15/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 732 times Debate No: 54773
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

Jman0056

Con

Chuck Norris is real.
Teemo

Pro

Yes, Chuck Norris is a real person. You are debating for the wrong side.
Debate Round No. 1
Jman0056

Con

I meant he isnt. Hes like santa clause. Hes not real.
Teemo

Pro

He is a real legit person. Though obviously his jokes are fake, he himself is a legit living human. Here is a video of him being interviewed. https://www.youtube.com... I have already proved he is a real person. Thanks for the debate.
Debate Round No. 2
Debate Round No. 3
Teemo

Pro

Also, it is impossible for them to use cgi. The reason being that this interview was dated back in the 1980's. This channel was not very famous, and thus didn't have much cash, so they couldn't afford cgi. Also, this was a live interview with thousands of people present who claim to have seen him. So, Chuck Norris is a real person, and you cannot prove otherwise.
Debate Round No. 4
Jman0056

Con

Thats what they want you to think. Can people REALLY go to burger king and get a happy meal? Is it really true that Light wishes it was faster than chuck norris's fists? No it's not. Chuck is a fantasy character. Here is my final argument for Man of Steel:
Frozen is the 3rd highest grossing movie of 2013, so of course it surpassed man of steel. It's also the 19th highest grossing movie of all time. And those where three of Disney's most succsesful movies.
But, if we are going to be comparing movies due to there grossings, Man of steel is 56th most highest grossing movies of all time in the US. Man of Steel beat the incredibles, Super 8, and the Lego movie, AND the Matrix.

Man of Steel was supposed to be dramatic and loud. It's not a comedy.

And again, Kryptons have always looked like Humans. It's been that way since Superman was invented. So I'm just assuming you're now attacking every Superman franchise and not just this movie?

I wouldn't say the best character was his dad. And he was killed off for a good reason. He was scared for Clark. Again, a touching moment in the movie.

Man of steel Was a good movie.
Good as in I liked it. And you didn't.

It portrayed a different side of Superman. A side we had yet to see. One that showed that we are ALL human. That life is not perfect. It's not always turn back time and fix things so every body lives happily ever after. Because not every thing has a happy ending. Even the end of the movie didn't end well for the Man of Steel. Clark now has to live with the guilt of killing the last of hus own kind!
In conclusion, Man of Steel is a movie that may not have made it out of the 50's in highest grossing rankings. It may not have gotton the best reviews, but Man of Steel is a movie that will be remembered for generations and generations to come.
I feel Man of Steel is a misunderstood movie. if you take time and think about what it means, Man of Steel has so many metaphors and parallels to real life. It shows NOBODY is invincable. Not even Man of Steel.

http://www.imdb.com...

http://boxofficemojo.com...
Teemo

Pro

You cannot prove that it is cgi. So, this point is invalid. Furthermore, various people have claimed to met Chuck Norris. Even I met him once at an MMA tournament. He is a real person. You failed to meet your BoP. I showed a legit live interview that was inpossible to include CGI. Chuck Norris is a real living person, your argument is invalid. Furthermore, CGI cannot create such a realistic figure as Chuck Norris.

Here is more proof of Chuck Norris being a real person. These are all live interviews, where he actually makes physical contact with others there, proving he isn't CGI.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://www.youtube.com...


In conclusion, Chuck Norris is a proven living person. He has been on various live interviews, and has been seen by many including myself. My opponent makes false accusations accusing it of being cgi, however such is just plain impossible.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Jman0056 3 years ago
Jman0056
Whats a face palm
Posted by Teemo 3 years ago
Teemo
*facepalm*
Posted by Jman0056 3 years ago
Jman0056
Lol whats a noob
Posted by Teemo 3 years ago
Teemo
MY Q IS THE BEST SNIPE brah.
Posted by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
lol another noob sniped by Teemo the noob sniper
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Cutiepuffle 3 years ago
Cutiepuffle
Jman0056TeemoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious win.
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
Jman0056TeemoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro simply made better arguments and had the sources to back them up.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
Jman0056TeemoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This was a troll debate, clearly. But Con seemed unclear what he was supposed to be supporting for the resolution, despite instigating the debate. And as Con had the presumptive BoP, Con's failure to craft a coherent case gives Pro the argument points. At least there were no forfeits! As always, happy to clarify this RFD.