The Instigator
OFT60
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
dsjpk5
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Classic Regressives on Parade here

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
dsjpk5
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/6/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 427 times Debate No: 78457
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

OFT60

Pro

Baltimore"s murder rate is up 48 percent this year.Baltimore"s murder rate is up 48 percent in 2015, the Baltimore Sun"s Jessica Anderson reports Thursday, with 144 tallied homicides.More than half of reported homicides (74) have occurred in the past two months. This has led many to accuse police of not doing their jobs in the wake of the indictments of six officers in the murder of Freddie Gray. May 2015 was the deadliest month Baltimore has seen in more than 40 years. May 2015 was the deadliest.

Do you see the ignorance of Regressives here ? They now claim the police are not doing their jobs !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ROTFFLMMFAO !!!!!!!!! Regressives have no brain !
dsjpk5

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for creating this debate.

PLAGIARISM

My opponent has plagiarized most of his first round argument from the following website:

http://fusion.net...

I ask the voters to consider this when voting.
Debate Round No. 1
OFT60

Pro

You can absolutely say without question it is fusion ?
dsjpk5

Con

Well, as anyone can see , you plagiarized from some website. Which one is irrelevant.
Debate Round No. 2
OFT60

Pro

http://www.baltimoresun.com...

What you got to say about that Regressive
dsjpk5

Con

No, that's not the one you copied from.
Debate Round No. 3
OFT60

Pro

Come on Regressive let's get to it. So The Baltimore Sun said what ? Come dispute it you OBIE SUPPORTER
dsjpk5

Con

Why are you calling me a "regressive"? What is an Obie?
Debate Round No. 4
OFT60

Pro

OFT60 forfeited this round.
dsjpk5

Con

Well, we never did find out what this debate was about. All we got from my opponent was plagiarism and forfeiture. The only thing Pro made that came close to being an argument was "Regressives have no brain!". This is easily defeated. As Pro points out, these regressives are making a claim. They are claiming the police are not doing their job. Well, making a claim requires a thought before the action takes place. Therefore, regressives must have a brain. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Theunkown 1 year ago
Theunkown
OFT60dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Plagirism and Forfeiture must not be tolerated.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
OFT60dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
OFT60dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con because of the forfeit. Sources to Con as Pro plagiarized their argument without sourcing it.