Cleveland and Akron are basically the same thing
Debate Rounds (3)
Akron only has 200,000 people in it, while Cleveland has about 400,000. Merge the two and it's still not even in the top 30 among biggest American cities. Therefore I have definitively argued Cleveland and Akron are both basically the same place and would be better served by merging and creating one city. Can't make it up.
Both cities have their own Chamber of Commerce.
Both cites have their own symphony orchestra. The Cleveland Orchestra is an American orchestra based in Cleveland, Ohio. It is one of the five American orchestras informally referred to as the "Big Five". Founded in 1918.
Akron has a completely different symphony that was founded in 1949. An important and basic difference between these two unique cities is clearly their different symphonys. If these two cites were the same, there would not be two musical entities with different names.
The New York metropolitan area, to use an example, is 468 square miles. Cleveland is just 82 square miles while Akron is just 62 square miles. They cannot be separate cities, as you see, because combined they're still just a quarter the size of my randomly selected example. The NYC city limits include cities in New Jersey and Connecticut, an area spanning three states. Surely Cleveland and Akron, a space less than 45 minutes apart, should be considered the same as well.
Lastly, LeBron James is from Akron, but everyone always talks about him being from Cleveland and the fact that he returned home to go to the Cavs. Thus it is commonly accepted that the two are virtually interchangeable.
The internet tells me that driving time between Akron and Cleveland is 39 miles. If these places were "basically the same thing", there would be no driving distance between them....ergo, they are not the same thing.
Have you ever heard of a place have 2 different mayors at once? Me either. The current Mayor of Akron is Donald L. Plusquellic. His counterpart in Cleveland is Mayor Frank G. Jackson. Two Mayors for two distinctly different places. Clearly not the "same thing". Basically.
Thank you for your time and I'm confident the voters will get this right if they read all the arguments.
Upon Googling "things to do in Akron", there is no mention of Cleveland. Similarly, the same can be said when you Google "things to do in Cleveland". The logical conclusion is that those two cities are not "basically the same thing".
Thank you for the debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hayd 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argues for why they should merge the two cities, not why they are the same city. Cons shows that they both have separate signs welcoming people to the city and shows that they have two different orchestras. Neither of these are refuted. Pri says that people mix up where Lebron is from, and some weird example of combined land area is small, but this assumes size had a say in whether it's a coty, which it doesn't. Con shows that Lebron says he's from Akrun, and refutes all Pro's arguments, thus Con wins.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.