The Instigator
bossyburrito
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
UnbiasedSymmetry
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Cloning of Humans

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
bossyburrito
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/18/2012 Category: Science
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,283 times Debate No: 23678
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

bossyburrito

Pro

I will be arguing for the cloning of humans. Clones will be defined as "
A cell, cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit or individual from which it was derived."[1]
Cloning will be defined as the process of creating a clone.[1]
First round for acceptance.

[1] http://dictionary.reference.com...
UnbiasedSymmetry

Con

I accept your challenge.
Debate Round No. 1
bossyburrito

Pro

I thank my opponent for accepting this debate.

Reason one:
Cloning can be used to create stem cells to regenerate damaged organs, therefore saving lives. [1]

Reason two:
Infertile couples can use cloning to put an embryo in their womb.

Reason three:
Research into what DNA affects what can lead to a possible cure to cancer.

I await your rebuttles.

[1]:http://www.humancloning.org...
UnbiasedSymmetry

Con

UnbiasedSymmetry forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
bossyburrito

Pro

No points contested. Apple Pie on a stick.
UnbiasedSymmetry

Con

UnbiasedSymmetry forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
bossyburrito

Pro

Vote tie.
Kittens.
UnbiasedSymmetry

Con

UnbiasedSymmetry forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 4 years ago
socialpinko
bossyburritoUnbiasedSymmetryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Even though Pro's arguments were extremely short and more assertive than substantiated, Con didn't contest any of his points and thus they are assumed to be conceded. Conduct and sources are obvious.