Coca-Cola is better than Pepsi
Debate Rounds (4)
Pepsi in my opinion is better than Coca-Cola. The kick in the drinks is based off of a body's way of metabolising what's put in to it. Caffeine probably effects your better than it does me. I can drink a can of Monster Energy and be out like a light taking a nap in a minute. So obviously, the kick part depends on the person. How about taste? Again, opinion, but on average, a person can tell the difference between the two drinks. I think this would be done better if we polled the audience. I think the audience should put their opinion in the comments, and we look from there.
Is apologize for not making this debate more interesting. I have not had the mental or physical capacity to debate due to me being sick. I apologize, and I would be more than happy to redo this debate and make it take interesting
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: This is truly bizarre to judge as the debaters are asking the voters to judge whether they personally prefer the sweetness or the carbonation. Something I won't do. In the end Pro simply put more effort into his arguments and created a larger set of arguments that Con didn't effectively address. In the future you'd both be better off avoiding debates that are solely about personal preference.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.