Communism better than Democracy?
Debate Rounds (3)
I hope that my opponent and I can learn from this Debate.
Democracy is Better than Comunism
*Many countries in America are Democratic, Capitalists. Capitalism is what can bring the population of a country to poverty, and poverty leads to death. For a Capitalist government, they want more than enough, and prices may become higher. In Communist countries, concentrates on the population of the country. Communist countries give you what you need to live, for example: Water, Food, House, Health. All of the following are given to each citizen inside the country. Of the economy of some democratic countries there is indeed evidence, for example, United States owes 17 trillion dollars to China and it has less money than Bill Gates which is 72 Billion.
Communism does not eliminate poverty or fix it or make it better; it just makes everyone equally poor.
No, I take that back. Communism makes everyone equally poor, EXCEPT for the political leaders who suckered you into giving them power. They will have their mansions, yachts, and limousines, and live a very good life - while you do not. Oh, well. You will be okay with it.
Democracy obviously has its faults, but it is superior to communism in that it leaves its citizens free to discuss those faults. The totalitarian elements inherent to communism brand it an ideology which has no place in the modern world.
Capitalism, since private business has no need to answer to government regulations, can practically do anything they desire in or to their businesses. Since no restrictions are placed on these companies, they are free to claim to be selling whatever they desire, such as inside of a can, when an entirely different substance can be found within. Therefore, since consumers cannot truly know what they are buying in a Capitalist economy, Communism is better for the product quality, and thus better for the health of the society.
Capitalism encourages private ownership and survival of the fittest economics. In a united world, where all countries are collaborating as one, survival of the fittest economics would most defiantly encourage separation of the poor and the rich. As the poor increase, and the rich demand more, war will eventually happen, thus uniting the world. Therefore, since no such economic classes exist in a Communist economy, Communism would be the best form of economics in a united world.
Please vote for Communism!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by YoshiBoy13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro: Con copy-pasted his entire round 1 argument // Arguments to Con: "United States owes 17 trillion dollars to China and it has less money than Bill Gates which is 72 Billion." Whether or not that is true, it is irrelevant, as it is not really a fair measure to compare one (albeit successful) man to an entire country's government. I have a book called "How to Lie with Statistics". I have learned a few things. Not a fair measure of comparison, and borderline misleading.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.