The Instigator
Magikarpediem
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
cho123
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Communism could work

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open with Elo Restrictions Point System: Select Winner
Started: 1/5/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 414 times Debate No: 67853
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Magikarpediem

Pro

'a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.'
I will be arguing for a system which owns the entire means of production however on housing it would work like a council housing system. Meaning property can be bought . Secondly the system would not have equal pay for everyone, rather there would be bands of jobs which require similar skill sets with pay rising up the band.
That is the definition we will be using
1st round will be acceptance.
You are not allowed to argue over semantics.
I'll be very interested to debate this topic and wish the best of luck to my opponent
cho123

Con

Communism could not work simply because it is against God's will.
That is not hard to grasp. In details :
Communism means cum + un(unity) + ism.
Therefore, cum-unism is a unity of cum, which is gay,
therefore evil by definition. Evil is against God's will,
because God is good, therefore communism could
not possibly work.
Debate Round No. 1
Magikarpediem

Pro

Magikarpediem forfeited this round.
cho123

Con

cho123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Magikarpediem

Pro

Magikarpediem forfeited this round.
cho123

Con

cho123 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.