I am against this because although I am not an American, the 4th Amendment to the constitution has written, " It Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures." the idea behind the warrant system requires probable cause. This was written into law to stop governments from being allowed to collect data and mantle mass surveillance. The recent PRISM leaks, are an unacceptable breach of the United State's own Constitution. If the PRISM system was useful at stopping terrorist attacks, how did the Boston Bombing instigator's slip through the program? even they would have had to have used a telephone, or an email, which should have been picked up. If surveillance of every person in the world is becoming acceptable in the name of 'security against terrorism'. what other crime will you allow your government to commit for 'security'
Yes, it can be allowed for it is abide conscience if you are really pure and no criminal cases in your past life or not even a single worry, will be okay to someone to get their private date without permission. That's why some cases are delayed because of the insufficient time and increasing volume of the needs of warrants before acting upon it.If a suspected person is wholesome and clean to its crime so he/she will have no argues about the information of that.
Reasons for voting decision: Pro effectively FFed; I give no credit for saying nothing until the final round when there can be no reply. (while unusual to use this, DDO orientation states that once an argument is dropped it cannot be picked up again; dropping them all for 2 rounds makes this rule valid; in turn invalidating pro's entire case)
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.