The Instigator
vipcard3
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
LeCervaeux13
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Companies and governments should be allowed to collect private data without permission or a warrant.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
vipcard3
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/14/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 551 times Debate No: 36673
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

vipcard3

Con

I am against this because although I am not an American, the 4th Amendment to the constitution has written, " It Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures." the idea behind the warrant system requires probable cause. This was written into law to stop governments from being allowed to collect data and mantle mass surveillance. The recent PRISM leaks, are an unacceptable breach of the United State's own Constitution. If the PRISM system was useful at stopping terrorist attacks, how did the Boston Bombing instigator's slip through the program? even they would have had to have used a telephone, or an email, which should have been picked up. If surveillance of every person in the world is becoming acceptable in the name of 'security against terrorism'. what other crime will you allow your government to commit for 'security'
LeCervaeux13

Pro

I accept your challenge to in supporting this topic and I hope to have a formal debate.
Debate Round No. 1
vipcard3

Con

my above arguments stand, as that was the acceptance round
LeCervaeux13

Pro

LeCervaeux13 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
vipcard3

Con

above arguments stand and am asking for an argument
LeCervaeux13

Pro

Yes, it can be allowed for it is abide conscience if you are really pure and no criminal cases in your past life or not even a single worry, will be okay to someone to get their private date without permission. That's why some cases are delayed because of the insufficient time and increasing volume of the needs of warrants before acting upon it.If a suspected person is wholesome and clean to its crime so he/she will have no argues about the information of that.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
vipcard3LeCervaeux13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro effectively FFed; I give no credit for saying nothing until the final round when there can be no reply. (while unusual to use this, DDO orientation states that once an argument is dropped it cannot be picked up again; dropping them all for 2 rounds makes this rule valid; in turn invalidating pro's entire case)