The Instigator
Crypto247
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mysterio
Con (against)
Winning
51 Points

Conservatives are smarter than liberals

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 14 votes the winner is...
Mysterio
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/20/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,787 times Debate No: 18900
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (8)
Votes (14)

 

Crypto247

Pro

In order to prove that I set only 1 round and just 5 minutes to answer. A smart person can answer in 5 minutes with only 500 characters with 1 round can they? Prove to me that is possible and say that cons are not smarter.
Mysterio

Con

Ok I can do this in less than 5 minutes. Claiming a whole group is smarter than another is impossible. You have to compare every single person in that group to do that. We cannot compare peope by groups but only by the person.
Debate Round No. 1
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by Nur-Ab-Sal 5 years ago
Nur-Ab-Sal
They should really just delete this.
Posted by CRBarrow 5 years ago
CRBarrow
No they're not
Posted by Viper-King 5 years ago
Viper-King
cons are smarter than libs!
Posted by ryalaway79 5 years ago
ryalaway79
good job Mysterio !!!

Crypto!! you need to read up on debating!!!!!!
Posted by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
Crypto's account was closed!
Posted by randolph7 5 years ago
randolph7
That was 5 mins we'll never get back.
Posted by WriterSelbe 5 years ago
WriterSelbe
Haha. You said conservatives are smarter than liberals. Haha.
Posted by CRBarrow 5 years ago
CRBarrow
Get owned dude
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Rasheed 5 years ago
Rasheed
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con simply had the best argument.
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: TROLOLOLOLOLOL
Vote Placed by Mr.Infidel 5 years ago
Mr.Infidel
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I smell a troll!
Vote Placed by socialpinko 5 years ago
socialpinko
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments should go automatically to Con since Pro never made any. Con's argument still made sense. If the resolution was the on balance, conservatives are smarter than liberals a case might have been able to be made. However due to the impossibility of comparing each and every conservative and liberal for intelligence, Pro's burden was impossible.
Vote Placed by SuperRobotWars 5 years ago
SuperRobotWars
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: WTF!
Vote Placed by Double_R 5 years ago
Double_R
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Troll
Vote Placed by rogue 5 years ago
rogue
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This was dumb.
Vote Placed by Calvincambridge 5 years ago
Calvincambridge
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: horriable debate.
Vote Placed by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: oh trolls....wasting the 30 seconds of my life it took to read this debate
Vote Placed by randolph7 5 years ago
randolph7
Crypto247MysterioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is obviously smarter