The Instigator
LogicalThinker
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Raisor
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

Contemporary First World Civil Societies Should Ban The Use Of The Death Penalty In The Crown Court

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Raisor
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/12/2011 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 997 times Debate No: 18312
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

LogicalThinker

Pro

Accept my challenge?

Resolved: Contemporary First World Civil Societies Should Ban The Use Of The Death Penalty In The Crown (Federal in America) Court.


Death penalty as defined by:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com...:
Noun 1. death penalty - putting a condemned person to death.


Federal court as defined by:
http://www.legal-explanations.com...
n. The court system handling civil and criminal cases determined by the Constitution's jurisdictions and federal statutes. Federal courts include federal district courts, district courts of appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, and specialised courts such as bankruptcy, tax, claims, and veterans' appeals.


Crown court as defined by thefreedictionary.com:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com...
(Law) English law a court of criminal jurisdiction holding sessions in towns throughout England and Wales at which circuit judges hear and determine cases.

First world as defined by Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org...In today's society the First World is viewed as countries who have the most advanced economies, the greatest influence, the highest standards of living, and the greatest technology.[2] After the Cold War these countries of the First World included member states of NATO, US aligned states, neutral countries who were developed and industrialized, and the former British Colonies which were considered developed. Countries were also placed into the First World based on how civilized the country was

Rules:
Round one for acceptance.

Rounds two--four to outline our respective cases. 8000 character limit.

Round five to refute our opponents claims. Self imposed 4000
character limit.

72 hours to debate.

One week to vote.

My opponent must adhere to these conditions.





Raisor

Con

I accept these terms.
Debate Round No. 1
LogicalThinker

Pro

LogicalThinker forfeited this round.
Raisor

Con

My opponent forfeited his opening argument.

Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 2
LogicalThinker

Pro

LogicalThinker forfeited this round.
Raisor

Con

Opponent forfeit.
Debate Round No. 3
LogicalThinker

Pro

LogicalThinker forfeited this round.
Raisor

Con

Opponent is afk
Debate Round No. 4
LogicalThinker

Pro

LogicalThinker forfeited this round.
Raisor

Con

opponent forfeit
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
LogicalThinkerRaisorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: At least Raisor did not forfeit...
Vote Placed by Cerebral_Narcissist 5 years ago
Cerebral_Narcissist
LogicalThinkerRaisorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit = Default to con.
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 5 years ago
Ore_Ele
LogicalThinkerRaisorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeits.
Vote Placed by Sketchy 5 years ago
Sketchy
LogicalThinkerRaisorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Duh. :P
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
LogicalThinkerRaisorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit