The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
3 Points

Corporal Punishment in schools

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/1/2011 Category: Education
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 17,360 times Debate No: 19082
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)





Corporal Punishment should not be a tactic used by teachers to recieve the expected behavior of a student.

R1: Acceptance + Position (No addition arguments, refer above for an example)

Thank you and good luck in advance to Pro.




Corporal punishment should be used in schools.

Corporal punishment is defined as:
"Physical punishment";
Debate Round No. 1


Good luck, Lordknukle.


Why shouldn't it be legal?

Trust Issues

Corporal punishment in school facilities involves the hitting/beating of a student if they have disobeyed class room or school rules. If corporal punishment were to be implemented as a form of disciplinary action, there is no doubt that students would cease to disobey rules. However, this method can and will severely damage a student's trust with their teachers. As a result of this, the student loses that connection with their teacher to the point where they can't go to them a source of comfort. For example:
  • James, 13 years old, has continuously interrupted the teacher with his distracting behavior. As punishment the teacher hits James in the face and is sent back to his seat.
Because this damages their teacher-student relationship, the student will most likely avoid using that teacher as a source of comfort for other issues he may be having (bullying, grades, etc).

Family/peer issues

I believe that is either extremely disobedient in class or has bad grades has either or both of these:
  • Abuse/neglect at home
  • Bullying inside and outside of school
At home: Lets refer to the year 2006. This year, 61% (or 1.25M) children were victims of some form of neglect. These include not only physical, but mental, educational, emotional, and even sexual ( Neglect and abuse at home has a tremendous effect on a child, and to prove this, please take the time to read some of these stories:

These children (mostly young) were all subject to some form of abuse. I'd like to point out one girl's story:

  • Judy: This young girl (age 10) was moved to 20 different foster homes. Her crazed step father had sexually and physically abused her for many years. As a result she threatened to commit suicide in a school bathroom (no relativity).

Take Judy's story and add the factor of corporal punishment in school. This would only add to here extremely bad situation and would have most likely ended up worse than it did.

Bullying: This link provides statistics on bullying. Feel free to scroll through. There is no doubt that students in fear of any form of bullying would not want to be beaten by their teacher for disobedience because:

  • 1. Teachers and school faculty are the "bully police", so to speak. If they are physically punishing their students, the victims of bullying are less likely to go to those people for assistance.
  • 2. Along with bullying, corporal punishment can cause the student to suffer from a depressive state of mind, resulting in possibly lack of loyalty and decline in curricular performance.

Lesson learned...?

What does corporal punishment in schools (and everywhere for that matter) accomplish? As I've said before, it is used to gain the expected behavior of the target. However, if this does work, another problem unveils itself. Not only does this inflict harm on the student, but it also teaches the student that you need to use physical violence to resolve disputes with peers, family, etc. This especially would become a problem when they are put in a position of authority.


Other methods (detention, suspension, etc.) can be far more effective, and for that matter, safer. Things like detention and suspension will not teach the student to resolve issues violently and will most likely not provoke depression (if not already being experienced from other matters). For detention especially, the teacher can assign tasks such as cleaning the desks, extra class work/homework, all the things that a student without detention would not want to do. As a result, the disobedient student would cease to break faculty rules.


Looking forward to your argument.

Sources listed:



I thank my opponent for posting his arguments.

I will bring up my own points and rebut some of my opponent's points.

I will elaborate on my rebuttals in future rounds, as I ran out of room.

I would like the readers to notice that my opponent is often the logical fallacy called "Appeal to Emotion". I will expand on this accusation later in the debate.

Before I begin my debate, I would like to say that I am not arguing for an extreme. I will be arguing for a moderate amount of corporal punishment.

My 5 contentions will be:

1. Corporal punishment serves as a deterrent
2. Corporal punishment saves the child's future
3. Corporal punishment is not abuse
4.Corporal punishment increases productivity
5. The Bible supports corporal punishment

Before anybody starts bashing me on my biblical argument, I would like to point out that my opponent has not set any criteria for available arguments. Therefore, I will use whatever I want. The Bible is provided as more of a "bonus" contention.

C1:Corporal punishment serves as a deterrent

Corporal punishment by itself, is not different that another type of punishment.
It is clear to everybody that punishment serves as a deterrent. If my opponent's tries to negate this, then he will have a very hard time.
Just the idea alone makes sense. If I add a punishment onto an action, the person will be less likely to commit the action again.
This applies to corporal punishment.
If a teacher slaps person X for verbal abuse, then he will most likely not do it again for fear of being slapped.
These practices successfully transition into a child's later life.... leading me to my next point

C2: Corporal punishment saves the child's future

Corporal punishment, in moderation, early in a child's life helps save their future.

Dr. Walter E. Williams, a famous economist says (2):
"Today, it's not uncommon for young criminals to be arrested, counseled and released to the custody of a parent 20 or 30 times before they spend one night in jail. Such a person is a very good candidate for later serving a long prison sentence or, worse, facing the death penalty. If you interviewed such a person and asked: "Thinking back to when you started your life of crime, would you have preferred a punishment, such as caning, that might have set you straight or be where you are today?" I'd bet my retirement money that he'd say he wished someone had caned some sense into him. That being the case, which is more cruel: caning or allowing such a person to become a criminal?"

"Experts theorize that corporal punishment helps create more disciplined and hard-working students and civilians that develop to be more prudent financially. When a nation develops its students into responsible citizens, the entire nation ultimately benefits through increased productivity and efficiency in the economy. Students learn through corporal punishment that there are greater objectives and goals beyond themselves. They ultimately learn to contribute to the economy in a positive way."(5)

I know that we are talking about corporal punishment in schools, but this directly relates back to it. "Whipping" out any bad practices early in a child's life is acceptable as it saves them from committing the same mistake in a unforgiving and cruel adult world.

Many children that would be corporally punished in schools are the "back-talkers", the interrupters, and verbal abusers. It is better to prevent these practices in childhood. In the adult world, verbal abuse and "back-talking" to your superiors is not tolerated. These practices can cause a child to lose their job, and even worse, their future.

This discouragement of bad habits sets children up to succeed.

Children are more impressionable than adults. Therefore, these effects will be amplified in them. (3)

C3: Corporal Punishment is not abuse

My opponent's main arguments are centered around abuse and corporal punishment. Abuse is:

"Use (something) to bad effect or for a bad purpose" (3)

To prove that a corporal punishment is not abuse, I must show that there is at least one positive effect of corporal punishment.
I have shown that corporal punishment saves a child's life in the future (and I will show how it increases productivity).
Therefore, corporal punishment is not abuse.
The logic goes as follows:

1. Abuse consists of using something for a bad purpose of effect
2. Corporal punishment helps children later in their life
3. Therefore, corporal punishment is not abuse.

This negates many of my opponent's points about abuse.

C4: Corporal punishment increases productivity

Corporal punishment increases productivity.

According to Surinder Kahai:
"Contingent punishment behaviors also have been found to be beneficial by promoting group drive and productivity"(6)

"Contingent reward behavior has been found to promote group drive, cohesiveness, and productivity. Contingent punishment behaviors also have been found to be beneficial by promoting group drive and productivity " (6)

This debate is not whether contingent punishment or contingent rewards are more efficient, simply about whether contingent punishment increases productivity.

However, corporal punishment also serves as a incentive.

Not everybody is going to get corporally punished. Corporal punishment also serves as a stimulant for those who don't misbehave.

By not getting punished, they think that they are doing the correct thing. Therefore, they will keep doing it.

This promotes good behaviour in those who already have it, and reduces bad behavior in those who misbehave.

C5: The Bible promotes corporal punishment

This serves as a "bonus" contention. According to the Bible:

Proverbs 23:14. The authorship is traditionally attributed to King Solomon: "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell."

"He who spareth his rod hateth his son, but he who loveth him is chasteneth him betimes." (King Solomon, in the Book of Proverbs [13:24].

"Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child; The rod of correction will drive it far from him." (Proverbs 22:15)

"Do not withhold correction from a child, for if you beat him with a rod, he will not die. You shall beat him with a rod. And deliver his soul from hell." (Proverbs 23:13)


Trust Issues

I fail to see how trust issues with teachers relate to students.
A teacher is not there to provide a source of comfort, merely a source for teaching and learning.
A school has guidance counselors which the students can go to if they have issues, not the teachers.

I assume that we are not talking about corporal punishment in the very low grades.
Since about Grade 3/4 and up, student/teacher relationships are merely focused on teaching.
In Junior High School, High School and University, there is virtually no student/teacher relationship.
Corporal punishment would not damage any trust issues with teachers as there aren't any.
If the student has problems, there is always a guidance counselor.

Family/Peer Issues

I would like to point out that my opponent is using "Appeal to Emotion" in this subtopic as he is listing random sad stories of children getting abused.
My opponent has also listed statistics (which I doubt are correct, but I will accept them for this point) that are completely irrelevant to this topic.

I have shown how Corporal Punishment is not abuse, therefore negating many of my opponent's points.


I am running out of room so I will quickly wrap this up. I have shown how corporal punishment serves as a deterrent to future misbehaving, saves the child's future, is not abuse, increases productivity, and the Bible promotes it.

Vote PRO

Good luck to CON

Debate Round No. 2


Conspiracy_Theory forfeited this round.


Well this is dissapointing. I was expecting my opponent's rebuttals.

Anyways, my arguments stand as is. They have not been refuted.

I urge that the voters

Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by MaliCarro 2 years ago
Corporal punishment shouldn't be allowed neither at home nor at school! It's downright cruel and instills in a kid wrong attitude to violence.
Posted by Lordknukle 6 years ago
Posted by Lordknukle 6 years ago
How exactly did he win this when I haven't even posted anything?
Posted by Grapeness 6 years ago
Conspiracy Theory won this hands and pens down.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 6 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Both did well, even though one forfeited. But I believe Pro had a really good case.