Cosmetic Surgery
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Ore_Ele
| Started: | 6/22/2012 | Category: | Health |
| Updated: | 11 months ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 645 times | Debate No: | 24388 |
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)
|
*please note : definition (for this purpose) - elective surgery to alter physical appearance with no compelling mental or medical reason
It is none of our business what other women chose to spend their money on, the country is democratic and we all have free choice. we should not judge others. in our economic situation, the country is a free market - the consumer rules - if consumers demand it then suppliers should be allowed to supply it. Furthermore, it is rational to want to look good and as we are constantly judged on our appearance, wanting to look great if fine. If it improves self esteem then its a good thing too. Cosmetic surgery adds over 1/2 a billion pounds to the UK economy GDP alone - and that was in 2006. development of cosmetic surgery has lead to improvements in reconstructive surgery in general medicine, therefore benefiting the NHS and other patients too. In conclusion, Banning cosmetic surgery wouldn't stop it, it is better for it to be safe and legal than dangerous and illegal, putting young, sensitive girls at risk.
Only 1,000 characters. Keeping short. As CON, I am against cosmetic surgery (CS). That does not mean I need to argue for criminalizing it, or taking government action against it. Countering any of those arguments would be a strawman fallacy. I merely believe the people should NOT CHOOSE IT. 1) Dangerous. Any surgery is inherently dangerous, and as such should be avoided unless necessary. Since we are talking about "elective," they are not necessary. CS finds it's own dangers and risks [1]. One main factor is that people don't understand the dangers [2] and that is being stunted by the industry. 2) No GDP Benefit If people didn't spend the 500 million pounds on CS, that money wouldn't disappear. The people would still have it and would be able to spend it on other services. Out of space, next round, thanks. [1] http://www.guardian.co.uk... [2] http://www.aboardcertifiedplasticsurgeonresource.com... |
![]() |
|
puddleduckxxx forfeited this round.
My opponent has forfeited their last round. I will simply extend and end. Thank you. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Xerge 11 months ago
| puddleduckxxx | Ore_Ele | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con for the forfeit. Con's arguments was also sourced and dropped by Pro in the last round as well.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 11 months ago
| puddleduckxxx | Ore_Ele | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit gives Con conduct. Arguments are also dropped via the forfeit.







