Could comets and meteors have brought water on earth?
Debate Rounds (5)
It is possible for comets and meteors to have water on and/or in them. It is possible for comets and meteors to come into contact with Earth. It is therefore possible that comets and/or meteors could have brought water to Earth.
Answer: I will not let my time be wasted with unnecessary calculations such as only qualifying certain groups of meteorites like carbonaceous chondrites, and then qualifying only water-bearing groups of that specific type of meteorite such as Cl which on average contain 22% water -- what I will perform is a calculation that is in favor of your meteorites-brought-water theory, so much in favor that it's beyond reality -- it will only reveal the true absuridity of the theory.
Let the calculations begin.
Components of the calculation:
(1) 1,260,000,000,000,000,000,000 liters of water in ocean (CORRECT - no advantages or disadvantages)
(2) A meteorite is a 500g hand size object with 90% water. (FALSE - but great advantage to you)
(3) The earth is 100 billion years old. (FALSE - but great advantage to you)
The actual calculation: 1,260,000,000,000,000,000,000 liters of water on earth / 0.45 liters of water on a meteorite (450g H2O) = 2,800,000,000,000,000,000,000 meteorites needed to account for water on earth. Then we divide the meteorites needed to account for water on earth 2,800,000,000,000,000,000,000 by the age of the earth 100,000,000,000 and we receive meteorites per year: 28,000,000,000
Question: Is 28,000,000,000 meteorites per year for 100 billion years realistic? State your scientific argument.
I was not aware that you intended for the debate to be on whether or not comets/meteors were the ultimate source for the existence of water on Earth. If this is the case, then you should have worded the title differently, or specified in round 1 that this was what you intended. I interpreted the title literally, by which I mean that I took it to mean exactly what it says: that comets and/or meteors could have brought water in any quantity to Earth.
This was not a play on semantics. The question of whether or not comets and/or meteors have brought water to Earthis a large debate, because, if they did, it is possible that they could have brought life to Earth.
In light of these clarifications, my arguments from the previous round extend to this round. I don't feel that I need to change my position, because, with respect, I was not responsible for the lack of specificity in the rules of the debate.
Then we agree, great!
The title isn't wrong, but it's not specific enough. Shall we just agree to a draw, then?
pr.Daniel_Jordan forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Cook123 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Draw
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.