The Instigator
Guywhoknowsmorethanyou
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Reformist
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

Could the Holocaust happen in America?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Reformist
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/12/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 410 times Debate No: 84880
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Guywhoknowsmorethanyou

Pro

Yes it can, you see Hitler had a dog, Dogs are the leading pets of America, Hitler shot his dog to kill it, the number one way to kill a dog today is through an injection, or a vaccination, if you will... Vaccinations cause autism, and everyone who says no obviously has Autism. Vaccinations are required by law in America, s o we can remain ignorant, like the Jews. And look where that how that turned out..... OBAMA IS LITERALLY HITLER!!!!!!! Anyone who has even a shred of intelligence can see that Obama is not From America, but from Germany.
Reformist

Con

Firstly I would like to make it known that my opponent has not shown one SPEC of evidence.

My opponents last statement about Obama being from Germany is just not true and even if it was being from Germany doesn't necessarily mean you want to start a mass genocide.

Hitler also did not Shoot his dog. He had his doctor inject him with cyanide to see if it would was potent enough to kill himself

My opponents statement about vaccinations is unwarranted and does not even pertain to the passage

Vote Con because Pro has made no case at all

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
GuywhoknowsmorethanyouReformistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not uphold the BOP. Only Con cited a source.
Vote Placed by LDG 1 year ago
LDG
GuywhoknowsmorethanyouReformistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not even try.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
GuywhoknowsmorethanyouReformistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro stated that Hitler shot his dog and used that as a sole justification as to why the Holocaust will happen in America. Since Pro had the burden of proof due to his usage of argumentation and the fact that he is affirming a change our current way of life (meaning that he needs to show WHY this change will happen), Con simply needed to refute Pro's arguments to negate and win. Con provides a source to show that Hitler DIDN'T shoot his dog. Since Pro provided no source of information to prove that Hitler shot his dog I view this as bare assertion whilst Con provided evidence. This shows that his view is supported by others and that his rebuttal bares weight unlike pro's arguments. I vote Con based on the fact that Pro's sole argument used to meet his BOP was successfully refuted by Con as explained above.