The Instigator
yay842
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Counter-attack using different w3apons.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/7/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 777 times Debate No: 37480
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

yay842

Pro

What will counter this weapon:
an AK-47
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

A atomic bomb can counter a AK-47 because it can just blow it off the map. :)
Debate Round No. 1
yay842

Pro

A M.O.A.B. (Mother of All Bombs) is the mother of the atomic bomb and it gives it a spanking for being naughty during the Cold War.
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

What my opponate says has nothing to do with the topic, even though the "(Mother of All Bombs) is the mother of the atomic bomb and it gives it a spanking for being naughty" a atomic bomb can counter a AK-47.
Debate Round No. 2
yay842

Pro

I countered the atomic bomb with a M.O.A.B. Also, its opponent, not opponate.
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

Okay, sorry you are correct sir opponent.


I use God's most awesome hand to bash all your arguments from the beginnng to the end, so I win because God's hand is the most transfinite weapon ever.

The End. I win, thank you for your time.
Debate Round No. 3
yay842

Pro

Well you know what? So you want me to tell you you who can defeat God? I can tell you what is greater than God or his hand. What can defeat God (and his hand) is.....

NOTHING! I choose nothing. That's right. NOTHING can beat God. HAHAHA! Nothing beats God (or his hand), and nothing cannot beat nothing.
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

Sir, since nothing beats God I'm sure I win right here and now.

:D Yay me!
Debate Round No. 4
yay842

Pro

EXACTLY, you also said nothing BEATS God, so I chose nothing. Nothing DOES BEAT God, just like you said.
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con


Since nothing beats God I win, I still win no matter if anything could posseble beat God's transfinite hand, because I said "Sir, since nothing beats God I'm sure I win right here and now.” And my opponent said, "EXACTLY." So that concludes my opponent agreed that I won. XD



Thank you for listening to my debate round, I hope it was satisfying and you learned a lot. XD

Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 4 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Lol, IKR? :P
Posted by makhdoom5 4 years ago
makhdoom5
hahahhahhhah.
childish
lol :)
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 4 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
People should vote. :/
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 4 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Dude! Why didn't you say so??? Goodness. Okay then...
Posted by funwiththoughts 4 years ago
funwiththoughts
I think the intention was that you'd counter his, then he counters yours, then you counter his, and so forth. That was what was done in his last 2 debates on this topic, and I assume that is what is meant here.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by leojm 4 years ago
leojm
yay842SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: True. Nice debate btw. :) Pro, wrong Idea to agree in a debate. But nice going. :)
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 4 years ago
funwiththoughts
yay842SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro due to Con's rather cocky and overdramatic attitude. Arguments to Pro since he did think of a weapon that beat God (specifically nothing), and Con refused to keep the game going, instead insisting that "your weapon beats mine therefore I win and you can't make any more arguments ever!!!!!!!!!lolzorz!!!!!!"
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 4 years ago
RoyLatham
yay842SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Silly waste of time debate. Con got to the God level first, so wins. "Nothing" is equivocation.