The Instigator
yay842
Pro (for)
Winning
17 Points
The Contender
DeBigVoter
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points

Counter attack with more weapons.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
yay842
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/23/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 816 times Debate No: 38059
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (6)

 

yay842

Pro

Yes, that's right. I'm bringing it back up because not enough fun debates to challenge with. Also, I'm bored. The rule is to use a different weapon to counter the last weapon. You need to keep on choosing a different weapon and not insisting on that the last weapon will beat everything. So try not to use anything that is too OP like God.

I'll start with a simple wooden baseball bat to whack people.
DeBigVoter

Con

We meet again. I counter-attack your baseball bat with a iron sword.
Debate Round No. 1
yay842

Pro

I use a spear. I can chuck that thing before you jump me with the sword.
DeBigVoter

Con

DeBigVoter forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
yay842

Pro

Well, I can't counter myself, so I'll wait until my opponent comes back.
DeBigVoter

Con

I apologize for my previous forfeit. I counter-attack your spear with throwing knifes. I can rip apart that spear.
Debate Round No. 3
yay842

Pro

I counter throwing knives with Tomahawks. It's larger, more swag, and sounds cooler, and it will smash through the throwing knives.
DeBigVoter

Con

DeBigVoter forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
yay842

Pro

Vote Pro!
But just in case, I use God as my next weapon.
DeBigVoter

Con

DeBigVoter forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Chrysippus 4 years ago
Chrysippus
@TheAntidoter:
Con clearly conceded this by forfeiting 3 out of the 5 rounds.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 4 years ago
funwiththoughts
yay842DeBigVoterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.
Vote Placed by drafterman 4 years ago
drafterman
yay842DeBigVoterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
yay842DeBigVoterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Pretty clear win due to FF, however as a note to guide pro from breaking his own rules again: conduct to con in spite of the FF.
Vote Placed by airmax1227 4 years ago
airmax1227
yay842DeBigVoterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con FF'd 3 rounds and left the debate open after Tomahawks were used by Pro, leaving Pro's Tomahawks as being the victorious weapon (argument) in this debate (unless we count god). So arguments to Pro. Con also FF'd 3 rounds, so conduct points to Pro as well.
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 4 years ago
Chrysippus
yay842DeBigVoterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro; con forfeited multiple times. SP/G tied; neither side stood out particularly. Arguments to Pro; multiple forfeits by Con concedes the "debate."
Vote Placed by TheAntidoter 4 years ago
TheAntidoter
yay842DeBigVoterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro Broke his own rule, as well as fasley advertised in the unvoted votes thread. As pro broke his own rule, his arguments based on it is fallacious. There needs to be the word "has" before more swag, so s and g to con also. No sources were used.