The Instigator
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MichaelPP
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

Creationistism is true and evolutionistismists are dumb

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
MichaelPP
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/21/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,085 times Debate No: 68638
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (12)
Votes (5)

 

GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Pro

First round is acceptance
MichaelPP

Con

Hello! This will be one of my first arguments and I take up the challenge.
Your current argument only states that the people that believe in evolution are dumb.

Dumb:
'mute, unable to speak'.
In this case I assume dumb as stupid. As an opinion of how the world is built cannot be stupid but pure personal preference. And again dumb is also quite subjective.

References:
http://en.wiktionary.org...
Debate Round No. 1
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Pro

Yes dumb does mean stupid. Now for my argument.

P1) Racism is false
P2) Evolution is racist
C1) Evolution is false
C2) Therefore creationistism is true

ITISDEBUNKEDgoddonitgodlovesyouevoluitonisevilBLAAAAAAARRRRRRRR
MichaelPP

Con

Your arguments are not upheld at all. I shall adress them one by one.

1 'Racism is false'

I have no idea what this even means. I will assume that you mean that it is incorrect or wrong. Yes it is wrong according to some point of views but it very much exists.

2. Evolution is in a sense racist because it believes some life forms are superior to others but it is not discriminating against them.

3. Evolution could technically be false but it is the most proven theory that upholds to date.

4. Creationism could be true but no proper arguments support it.

And to adress your last statement. I as an religious person & believer in evolution believe that your last statement is just an act of trying to in some form make fun of religious people that sadly believe in Creationism.
Debate Round No. 2
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Pro

The Big Bang Theory? HAHAHAHAHA! an explosion creating everything in the universe!?!? LOLZ! Explosions cause DEstruction, not CONstruction! Implausible! Clearly goddonit!
MichaelPP

Con

You're not coming with any actual arguments that hold up now. I rest my case.
Debate Round No. 3
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Pro

so u give up? Are you gonna address my argument or not?
MichaelPP

Con

Why would I adress it when it has no relevance to the subject of creationism/evolution.
Evolution is what explains the change in phenotypes and many other things in organisms and Big Bang is the explaation of how we came to exist.
Debate Round No. 4
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Pro

So is creationistism
MichaelPP

Con

Yes Creationism also explains this. But Big Bang has nothing to do with it.
Debate Round No. 5
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by GamrDeb8rBbrH8r 2 years ago
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
great idea. I'll use my forum signature to do that.
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
This one should be advertised on the religion forum. It actually mirrors a topic I started on the subject of people pretending to be of one group, solely to misrepresent it (only this time pro is honestly not of said group, but just having a troll debate).
Posted by GamrDeb8rBbrH8r 2 years ago
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
I dont really believe this $h1t. Im just trolling.
Posted by MichaelPP 2 years ago
MichaelPP
Well then if you are an intelligent man. Why the the belief that it is overrated?
Posted by GamrDeb8rBbrH8r 2 years ago
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
I am not trying to come off as intelligent, though actually I am.
Posted by MichaelPP 2 years ago
MichaelPP
That is quite a sad statement. Since you're trying to come off as an intelligent man on your profile.
Posted by GamrDeb8rBbrH8r 2 years ago
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
i know. But intellignce is overrated
Posted by MichaelPP 2 years ago
MichaelPP
Hi Gamr. I am aware that this debate is pure 'troll' but we can still try to have an intelligent conversation about it.
Posted by GamrDeb8rBbrH8r 2 years ago
GamrDeb8rBbrH8r
@Ragnar: of course im trolling. It's a religitroll debate. Evolutionistismist=evolutionist.
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
It's a troll debate, I mean what exactly is an "evolutionistismist?" I know what an evolutionist is, but hard for an evolutionistismist to be of any intellect.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Kylar 2 years ago
Kylar
GamrDeb8rBbrH8rMichaelPPTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was a little bit more amusing than some I have seen on this topic, so conduct is equal. Con defended his case well, and plus I am a creationist
Vote Placed by Austin1061 2 years ago
Austin1061
GamrDeb8rBbrH8rMichaelPPTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: The con actually attempted to make an argument. It is impossible for the Pro to debate is they cannot set their arrogance aside and respect the opposing viewpoint.
Vote Placed by NoMagic 2 years ago
NoMagic
GamrDeb8rBbrH8rMichaelPPTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Like a reason is needed
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
GamrDeb8rBbrH8rMichaelPPTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: S&G goes to Con due to Pro's poor grammatical skills. Con's argument was not refuted and thus Con wins the debate because of it.
Vote Placed by PapaNolan 2 years ago
PapaNolan
GamrDeb8rBbrH8rMichaelPPTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: He was the only one who posted a logical argument with reasons.