Crimea has a right to secede from Ukraine
Debate Rounds (3)
A regional people and or a regional government has the right to secede from a nation and secession, the ability to throw off ones government is a basic human right. A region and or regional people can declare independence in the result of being badly failed, prosecuted or worse by a standing government in order to join with another state or form an independent state.
In the case of Crimea, an ethnic-cultural and economic tie to Russia in this Region is obvious and strong. The suggestion that their secession should need the permission fo a state they have remarkably little in common with,especially after the usurper government is composed of radical Nationalists and even openly neo Nazi factions have a controlling interest in the new government.
Crimea clearly has a right to its secession. The debate, if you accept will be in 3 rounds.
Round 1: Opening Argument
Round 2: Rebuttal and Questions.
Round 3: Answers and closing argument.
I was not aware the debate time was only a day, so I will have to forfeit this round. Sorry, but only 2 minutes left.
Apologies , I set the debate time for a day because my initial thoughts where that a 3 round debate could be made to go a bit quicker. In the future I will maintain the normal 3 day period. I would ask anyone voting on this debate not to hold the missed deadline against jifpop, even though he was able to see the terms of the debate before he accepted the challenge ( See what I did there. ;) )
Cession is a right of any free people, to truly be a free people the ability to break away from a government that is disassociate with the values of the people in the region, even disconnected with the language and preferences of the people in the region. In the poll form which I made this challenge you wrote the following:
Jifpop09 saysMarch 10 2014 06:45 AM
You can't have a referendum, but exclude 80% of the country. It's like if Arkansaw wanted to secede, but people in Ohio couldn't vote.
To give this into relevance it needs additional context, In this scenario the legitimately elected government has been deposed and replaced with a government controlled by radical right wing elements, primarily i7;k4;l6;k3;l6;k6;k2; (svoboda) an equivalent translation is National Socialist or more commonly called Fascists or Neo Nazis. So lets say the federal government was completely hijacked by a radical winged movement. Arkansas than says " This country no longer presents our people, our values or our wishes" the Democratically elected state government than votes on a measure to break away and become independent. This is a more accurate portrayal of the Crimean situation save that Crimea is joining Russia rather than becoming an independent nation state.
Argument 1: People can only Secede when the nation is causing active harm
- International Law allows nations to Secede, only when the government is causing active harm to the population, or they are being oppressed politically. Currently, Crimean citizens have all the rights that Ukranians do, you could even argue a little more. They can participate in active government, and from what I know, the government is not suppressing ethnic Russians. Which makes seccesion illegal by international law.
Argument 2: Secession has to be through the International Community
In responce to your rebuttal (Never seen anyone use me as a source :), Arkansaw can't just secede. By law, any act of seperation needs to be done through the international community, and the country in question. The Crimean Parliament can't just secede, they need to bring it to the community of nations, and need to involve Ukraine before they can make a referendrum.
It's like me saying to the residents of my town, I decided were going to Secede from the US, there will be a vote on tuesday. If the vote was in favor, does that give me my seccesion valid?
Further, it is a folly that West is focusing its attention on Russia. Crimea is the one having the vote. Does the hypocrisy of supposedly democratic nations disregarding democratic processes really not make its own point?
http://www.mcclatchydc.com... <- Article Outlines the nature of the vote, as well as touching on the relationship Crimea has with both Ukraine and Russia.
The Right Sector speaks: http://mag.newsweek.com...
Alternate source: http://www.nytimes.com...
And with this, despite there being quite a bit more resources to support a Dangerous Neo Nazi control of the Ukrainian revolution. The White house and west continues to deny what is obvious. That an Illegal and dangerous coup was mounted by a Dangerous neo Nazi sect successfully deposed a elected government and now controls Kiev.
Thank you for the Debate Jifpop09 and look forward to having more of them with you.
Why the referendum is not legitimate
Russia is swaying voters
1. Currently, Crimeans are not allowed to view Ukrainian media. This is an obvious attempt to sway voters, which only emphasizes the importance of international supervision in the upcoming referendum.
2. If you have not been updated on current events, Russia has assembled a huge invasion force outside Crimea. Is it unreasonable to assume voters may be swayed by this scare tactic? That's not even all. They've likewise, been doing miliitary exercises off the coast of poland and lithuania. The two most vocal about the Crimean Crisis.
While the vote may violate international law, the revolution which deposed a legitimately elected government was like wise illegal.
It was hardly a revolution. They were mass protests, and then the president starting cracking down on them. This is a crime against humanity, and that's why the parliament ousted him.
Besides this, the international community has no stake in their issue, no skin in the game as the saying goes.
I believe they do. The countries have formed these laws not without reason. They were to ensure peace and stability, and to keep security within the community. Seccessions ussualy lead to death, and that is probably whats going to happen if Crimea joins Russia. If they want to secede, they have to go through legal channels.
The process for deciding its secession is being handled democratically, but above that the Government of Ukraine whichto which Crimea was a part- has been Deposed. The Elected government is in Exile and so It is hard pressing say to the people in Crimea 'No, you must remain in Ukraine- Even though the rest of the country has over thrown the elected government... even though the new Government is controlled by radical right wing Nationalists, You cannot secede until there is blood in the streets'. This is the case international community brings to the table.
Once again, when a government starts killing protestors, then that is when the people have a right to dispose them. The parliament democratically impeached him.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.