The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Cruise Tasik Putrajaya should be stopped

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/17/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,121 times Debate No: 34835
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




I believe the Cruise Tasik Putrajaya, in Putrajaya Malaysia should be stopped. Unlike the Venice reviers, there's nothing much to see in Putrajaya except for the massive government complexes.

Yes, the catamarans and the traditional boats look nice, but apart from that, there's nothing much there.

The place should have a water extreme park instead.


I accept this debate.

I disagree, people don't use the Cruise Tasik Putrajaya just to go site seeing. They go for the experience. I mean how many of us can say that we've been on boat. Let alone a cruise! Something like this is special and is also key for the Burmian (aka Malaysia) economy. We can see that one way to make money is through the tourism industry That is exactly what Burma is trying to do here is make money through the Tourism Industry and if you put a stop to it you will hurt their economy.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by GhostOfRazgriz 5 years ago
I'll accept this challenge if no one else will.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by GOP 5 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro should have added more rounds...Since he only put one round, this means that Con simply had to accept the debate and get the easy win. Due to the lack of rounds, Pro sadly cannot offer rebuttals. Also, the economy is not going to function well unless it is going to circulate by various means of businesses and services, which I believe Con pointed out very well.