Cute atheist butt
Debate Rounds (4)
** NOTE ** I am only accepting this debate so that I can vote on 2500 Elo debates.
Well if that's your attitude...
Contention 1: Conversion
My opponent must take into consideration that if a religious person deicdes that they are no longer religious and therefore becomes an atheist, this does not mean that they will automatically gain any sterotypes associated with atheism (including the stereotype that my opponent is proposing. My opponent's burden requires them to prove that all atheists havve cute butts. Converted atheists must have been theists previously and as a result of this, we can tell that they must not have been born with cute butts (according to your logic). Once converted to atheism there are no scientific studies regarding this topic that suggest that theists that have converted to atheism have any changes occuring in their butt.
Contention 2: Opposite Conversion
This is very similar to my first contention except it is the other way round. If an atheist decides that they believe in God or a particular religion then their butt does not change in any way, shape or form because of this factor. If my opponent can provide a study that proves me wrong then I recommend that they find it and link it to me however I will be extremely surprised if they mangage to do so.
Contention 3: Children
If all atheists have cute butts then this raises similar issues regarding the first two contentions. If a theist is born with a theist butt then a theist that has converted to atheism should suffer no changes in their butt because of this. If they then have children that are brought up as atheists does that mean that they have an atheist butt or a theist one? They are atheists however they are descendants from theists. This raises major questions and inconsistencies. The same applies vice versa for an atheist that has converted to a theist.
Children aren't technically religious when they are young because they do not know what God means and therefore they cannot develop a justified opinion of God. Beliefs come when you are old enough to weigh out the different religions and beliefs and decide which one you think best suits your beliefs. Since the decision of your religion isn't always passed down from your parents a theist born from an atheist parent will have an atheist butt (according to my opponent's logic).
Your religion does not determine the cuteness of your butt unless you can objectively prove this. The only way that a religion can determine the butt is if everyone from a certain religion is primarily based in one area or country. This is not a direct result of religion though. It is based on your nationality not your religion.
Cute is a subjective term. If atheists have cute butts then there must be something worse. If theists also have cute butts then that must mean that all butts are cute. If all butts are cute then all butts are neutral and therefore they aren't cute.
I extend out all of my contention because none of them have been directly contested with.
All arguments extended. I urge all voters to vote con.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was pretty straight forward. Arguments to Con considering that he was the only one who actually made an argument then Pro dropped these arguments. Spelling and Grammar to Con due to Pro's horrific spelling, especially in rounds 3 and 4. This debate goes to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.