The Instigator
groverrohan
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
socialpinko
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Cyberbullying should be a criminal offense.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/4/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 5,489 times Debate No: 18173
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (14)
Votes (2)

 

groverrohan

Pro

First round will be acceptance.

This debate will be in the Parliamentary style, with the 1st PRO round presenting a plan based off of the resolution and constructive arguments based on that plan; the 1st CON round presenting either a counterplan, disadvantages, or both; the 2nd round involving counterarguments and disadvantages, and the 3rd round being a summary and final persuasive round in which the burden of proof and impacts shall be key, and no new arguments may be presented (only new counterarguments).

Good luck!
socialpinko

Con

Since my opponent neglected to define the terms of the resolution, I will take the liberty of doing so here.

Cyberbullying will mean "the electronic posting of mean-spirited messages about a person (as a student) often done anonymously"[1]. Cyber bullying is also done between two children or teenagers as opposed to cyber stalking or cyber harrassment involving two adults or one adult and a child[2]. Criminal offense can be defined as an act punishable by law. Ought will mean should.

As per my opponent's rules I will allow him to present his case first in the next round.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
[2] http://www.starw.org...
Debate Round No. 1
groverrohan

Pro

Thanks. I look forward to this round.

PRO Round 1

Observation 1: I agree with my opponent's definitions for "criminal offense" and "ought". However, as his definition of cyberbullying narrows the topic down to children and students only, I will present a separate one to avoid any potential topicalities (cyberbullying and cyberharassment do occur among adults [a]).
cyberbullying: the use of information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behaviour by an individual or group, that is intended to harm others [b].

Observation 2: This shall be a policy round, in that rather than only comparing facts or personal values, my opponent and I shall primarily be using good ol' argumentation to establish (or prevent the establishment of) a policy. My burden of proof is simply to demonstrate that the policy that I present holds more benefits to affected citizens than not having this policy.

Observation 3: PLAN: In the state of Florida, any person convicted of cyberbullying shall be sentenced to a $1,000 fine, a year in prison for a misdemeanor, or both, as per court judge's discretion.

This plan, having been established by the PRO, shall now replace the resolution as the topic being debated, as per Parli rules [j]. The plan has been set in the state of Florida due to the fact that penal codes cannot be established by the federal government for misdemeanors and because this, being my opponent's home state, helps keep the round on an even level. If my opponent feels that this plan sets the scope to be too narrow, he can present a topic-relevant counter-plan in the second part of this round. The numbers $1000 and 1 year come from the penalties in the state of California, where I reside [c].

Observation 4: Solvency, warranted by enthymemes.

  • Claim: Cyberbullying is a widespread problem [e].
  • Claim: Criminalizing cyberbullying would help prevent this problem, because people are afraid of jail. Criminalizing means people caught cyberbullying go to jail. People don’t like jail, so they don’t cyberbully. Nobody likes the timeout corner.
  • Warrant: Simple precedence shows that marijuana, which was quite popular in the 60s, has decreased in popularity ever since its illegalization [d]. It's a generally accepted fact that criminalization of an act helps prevent that act.
  • Solve: Criminalizing helps solve the problem of cyberbullying.

Observation 5: Advantages
Advantage 1:
Criminalizing cyberbullying prevents depression and suicides.

  • Claim: Cyberbullying is a major cause of depression, and depression frequently can cause suicides. Also, depression can lead to students dropping out of school.
  • Warrant: Cyberbullying is directly linked with an increased rate of depression, according to a study by the National Institutes of Health as reported by Reuters. In fact, cyberbullying is considered even more traumatizing to a victim than being physically beaten by the offender [f].
  • Warrant: Untreated depression is the #1 cause of suicide, reports Suicide.org [g].
  • Warrant: Feelings of depression contribute significantly to school dropout rates, according to studies by the University of Montreal [h].
  • Impact: Cyberbullying causes suicides.
    • Sub-impact: In addition to the obvious problems this causes, suicides, in turn, have their negative effects on society, by causing family problems, more depression among friends and peers, etc.
  • Impact: Cyberbullying causes people to drop out of school [h].
    • Cyberbullying causes depression, and depression causes people to drop out of school, ruining future job prospects.
  • IMPACT: Since, as established in the solvency, criminalizing cyberbullying helps solve the problem, criminalizing cyberbullying would help prevent this depression, avoid these suicides and save lives. It would also prevent school dropouts, resulting in a smarter workforce tomorrow.

Advantage 2: Criminalizing cyberbullying encourages positive social networking.

  • Claim: Cyberbullying is scaring social networkers, or the people who visit social networking sites, away from social networking sites.
  • Warrant: 40% of teens who use social networks report being cyberbullied, compared to 22% who are not on social networks, making it a common medium for cyber bullying [e].
  • Impact: Criminalizing cyberbullying will bring back networking visitors because they would be able to share and be social without the fear of being cyberbullied. This in turn, will deter the number of suicides caused by depression that is in turn caused by cyberbullying.
  • IMPACT: Not only do networking users benefit, but social network sites would earn more money, thus injecting more money into the recession-plagued economy and generally having a positive impact on the markets.

Advantage 3: Criminalizing cyberbullying creates an inflation of jobs.

  • Claim: Criminalizing cyberbullying results in a number of people having to watch the Internet.
  • Warrant: Of over 310 million are currently in the United States at the moment, nearly 28 million are jobless. [i]
  • Impact: Because of the need for Internet security, networking industries will start hiring jobless people to watch for cyberbullies, causing an inflation in both jobs and revenue. This could potentially turn the economy around.
Observation 6: Status Quo
Currently, in the state of California, as in nearly all other states, cyberbullying is already a criminal offense. CA Penal Code 653.2 prohibits the use of electronic communications technology to cause any mental, emotional, or physical harm to another person [c]. The status quo is in place for a reason: these laws are necessary to protect the people. My opponent’s job is to now prove that a law criminalizing cyberbullying in Florida (currently FL education code says cyberbullying punishments are a school-district by school-district basis), and thus creating a $1,000 fine and a year of imprisonment, is not beneficial to the residents of Florida. I eagerly await his response.

[a] http://www.personneltoday.com...
[b] http://www.cyberbullying.org...

[c] http://www.leginfo.ca.gov...

[d] http://www.signonsandiego.com...

[e] http://www.pewinternet.org...

[f] http://www.reuters.com...

[g] http://www.suicide.org...

[h] http://www.emaxhealth.com...

[i] http://www.bls.gov...

[j] http://www.apdaweb.org...

socialpinko

Con

socialpinko forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
groverrohan

Pro

As my opponent has been unable to respond to the second round, I have nothing to post. He may present disadvantages in this debate round, and new arguments will be permitted in the final rounds for counterargumentative purposes. I hope my opponent will be able to respond by the allotted time or I'm afraid that this debate won't really work...
socialpinko

Con

socialpinko forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
groverrohan

Pro

Well...Under most circumstances I would spend this round presenting counterarguments, weighing probability, magnitude, and timeframe; demonstrate how I successfully refuted his arguments, disadvantages, and refutations, but a look at the above rounds kinda demonstrates that I really don't need to :S

....Vote Pro...?
socialpinko

Con

Sorry about that. I haven't been able to get to a computer and even now am writing this from my phone. Vote pro.
Debate Round No. 4
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by groverrohan 6 years ago
groverrohan
Don't worry about it Socialpinko, if you like we can do this again or ican challenge someone else. Thanks anyway :)
Posted by groverrohan 6 years ago
groverrohan
Okay, well, as I really don't have anything to post this round, why don't we just deal with disadvantages and counterarguments in the Final Focus section? Or actually, you can bring them up in the next round, but then I'd kinda need to be able to introduce new arguments and counterarguments in the Final Focus.
Posted by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
Saturday morning would be best.
Posted by groverrohan 6 years ago
groverrohan
That's okay. How about you tell me what time would be good for you and I'll post slightly before then?

Let me know.
Posted by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
Sorry, I won't have time to post my response before the time runs out.
Posted by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
I'll plunge into this in an hour or so.
Posted by groverrohan 6 years ago
groverrohan
I agree that it was a pretty useless PoFo debate topic due to the use of the word "should"; however, it should have much more potential as a Parli round (even though the structure really doesn't work well with debate.org).

And, don't worry, thett3, I already had that. A CA appellate court ruled the "freedom of speech" argument against cyberbullying in Jan 2009, I believe.
Posted by thett3 6 years ago
thett3
Sorry, I didnt think about your opponent reading tht when I posted the comment. I was just responding to ryan_thomas.
Posted by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
I'll respond to that objection if my opponent brings it up.
Posted by thett3 6 years ago
thett3
The AFF can argue that since cyber bullying infringes on the rights of another, the freedom of speech for the cyberbully is trump by their violation of the victims right to privacy/security ect.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
groverrohansocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by jewgirl 5 years ago
jewgirl
groverrohansocialpinkoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: unfotunate non debate.