The Instigator
Mr.Singh
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Suuu
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

"DIARY OF ANNE FRANK" was a fraud!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/31/2016 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 520 times Debate No: 85806
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

Mr.Singh

Pro

Anne Frank was victim of Holocaust who was a brave girl and kept a diary of her ordeal during Holocaust which narrates horrors of Holocaust. THAT IS A LIE

Truth:
Textbook History has myths that live a longer and richer life than truth. A New York Court awarded $50,000 to an American novelist Meyer Levin, to be paid By Otto Frank the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's novel "Diary of a Young Girl" also known as "Diary of Anne Frank". Mr. Otto Frank, had promised to pay to a Jewish novelist Meyer Levin not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter"s original work.

Otto Frank later decided on a Broadway production of the same novel but did not pay Meyer Levin for use of his novel for Broadway production whcih was against the terms of contract. hence Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the New York Court Jury awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his 'intellectual work'.

The Jury awarded $ 50,000 dollars as compensation to be paid by Otto Frank father of Anne Frank to Jew novelist Meyer Levin who wrote Diary of Anne Frank. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law as it was not based upon "legal" evidence of loss. The reason was that if Writer Meyer levin had written the said novel under his own name and sold it as it was a fiction, then it would not have sold so many copies. Because Otto Frank father of Anne frank gave this fictional novel name of his dead daughter and projected to gullible public as "real" story of Anne Frank that so many copies were sold and windfall profits were made. However in further appeal against the order of Judge Coleman, by Jewish novelist Meyer Levin matter was compromised out of court between the parties.

Jewish writer Meyer Levin had approached the Court for his claim for damages on account of writing the "Diary of Anne Frank", He had also won his case from the Jury, He would not have withdrawn his Appeal had he not been paid out of court by Otto Frank, to avoid media publicity. So Otto Frank did pay Jewish writer Meyer Levin $ 50,000 dollars or thereabout for writing "Diary of Anne Frank".

Complete details of the case are available in case titled Meyer Levin Vs Otto Frank, File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk"s office.

In 1980, Otto Frank sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment. In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's handwriting. The bureau determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until 1951 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.
The German magazine, Der Spiegel, published an account of this report stating that;-
(a) some editing postdated 1951;
(b) Experts had held that all the writing in the journal was by the same hand; and thus "
(c) the entire diary was a postwar fake.

The diary of Anne frank is written in Ball point pen. Ball point pen was invented by L"szl" B"r", in 1938. In 1940 the B"r" brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, moved to Argentina fleeing Nazi Germany and on June 10 filed for its patent. however it never came into production till about 29 October 1945 in America and was not readily available to all till 1951. Children were not even allowed to use Ball point pen till several years later as it destroyed their hand writing.

Millions of humans world wide were fed a fiction by Jew Otto Frank for the sake of money is nothing new. In any case it was not the fault of Anne Frank. She had not done anything wrong. She had not even written any diary.
Sources;-
http://www.rense.com...
http://www.mathaba.net...
http://www.heretical.com...
http://www.ihr.org...
http://www.campbellmgold.com...
Note by author;-
What everybody believes in, is that Jewish Writer Meyer Levin had impersonated Anne frank, the extent of impersonation is in doubt whether it was "X" % or "Y"%. To my mind if impersonation is accepted then whether it is in part or in whole is immaterial. Even those who believe that Anne Frank wrote part of diary also believe that her father tore off part of her diary which was favorable to Nazi regime and unfavorable to her own family particularly unfavorable to her own father Otto Frank. So whether it is a case of half truth or full lies, the diary has to be denounced as fake.

Secondly If Meyer Levin had not written the first part someone who was "paid well" might have, receipt properly taken and no cause for a court case !!!
Thirdly where is the case for profits, such instances come dime a dozen in:-
a) All 70 + Countries attacked and enslaved for world domination British where every household suffered similar fate in the hands of their British masters.
b) Treatment of slaves in America or treatment of US native inhabitants by European immigrants or Jews who are ruling US today.
c) Treatment of slaves by Europeans. The bible mentions that the Jews went into slavery. Deuteronomy 28:68 and they had yokes of iron put around their necks. Deuteronomy 28:48
d) Every place which has suffered slavery has worst diaries, except that in those countries slaves do not own the media.

Lastly in some countries denial of holocaust / or Anne frank diary is illegal. In some cities particularly in Amsterdam such diaries have been used to generate massive tourism and made a source of revenue. Such cities / countries or their "courts of law" will jealously defend the diary and will prosecute to the extent of bankruptcy anyone and everyone who publicly denies the diary as a fraud. However such prosecution has nothing to do with upholding the truth but more to protect the revenue illegally earned over last fifty five years. A case in hand is that of David Irwing. Another is Julian Assange, who has been persecuted for publishing truth in Wikileaks. Nobody has challenged the truth in Wikileaks yet Julian Assange has been persecuted to the extent of bankruptcy.

Freedom can mean freedom of expression or freedom to sway the masses by the money power of political donations, or having your own chosen one as a puppet President 'who' then decides on judges most of whom dance to moneyers behind their appointments.
Suuu

Con

I accept this debate.
I would like to start off by stating that the first half of the instigators argument is copied and pasted from his first source, and would also like to call into question the neutrality and the reliability of the sources, which all are opinionated articles, rather than primary sources which have conducted their own research. None of those articles names are present, nor are any of those historians, nor trusted forensic analysts (owing to the claim of the diary being written in ballpoint ink), but Holocaust denialists.

I would also like to point out that Meyer Levin did indeed sue, but for plagiarism of his play based on 'the diary of anne frank'. A quick google search reveals that the court case claimed by the instigator does not exist.

I also question whether the instigator truly wants a debate, or is here to express his controversial, false, and holocaust denialist sentiments, as he has simply copy-pasted his argument, has not done any real research, and shows conspiracy-theorist-esque arguments, which have no scientific basis.

Freedom of expression means that you are able to say anything you want, but that does not stop the consequences from your words. People will disprove false and unbased claims, and I am using my freedom of speech to tell the instigator to wake up, learn the difference between scholarly articles and opinions, and to stop twisting around irrelevant facts. David Irwing and Julian Assange simply do not have anything to do with the validity of Anne Frank's diary.
Debate Round No. 1
Mr.Singh

Pro

Mr.Singh forfeited this round.
Suuu

Con

I would like to add, there is a reason that in some countries Holocaust Denial is illegal. This is because it is the denial of an event that killed 6 million Jewish people, and refusing to accept that this significant event happened is basically spitting on the 6 million women and children who were killed in this event. Refusing that the Holocaust happened is going against science, and all the historical evidence to date, as well as the mass graves, gas chambers, pictures, memories, and items left from the holocaust, including the bones and ashes of 6 million people. It is tarnishing the lives that these people used to live until they were killed by the Nazi's. Simply put, it goes against all of humanity, and what we should stand for as a human race. That is the reason why Holocaust Denial is illegal, and why the instigator of this debate and the like should grow a brain, look at the 6 million lost lives, and start being useful to society.
Debate Round No. 2
Mr.Singh

Pro

Mr.Singh forfeited this round.
Suuu

Con

Suuu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Mr.Singh

Pro

Mr.Singh forfeited this round.
Suuu

Con

Suuu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Mr.Singh

Pro

Mr.Singh forfeited this round.
Suuu

Con

Suuu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Suuu 1 year ago
Suuu
Honestly don't know what this guy is thinking. Probably believes everything but the truth. ehh. I can copy paste arguments as well sir.
Posted by Prelaw 1 year ago
Prelaw
Dude what is wrong with you? Are you in love either Nazis, Adolf? Are you an anti Semite??? I mean come on!!
No votes have been placed for this debate.