The Instigator
gg4xwnw
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
henryzietlow
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points

Dark chocolate makes your boobs firm

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
henryzietlow
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/19/2015 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 589 times Debate No: 70327
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)

 

gg4xwnw

Pro

The myth says that a piece of chocolate each day will give you firm boobs. That is true! Actually you can also loose weight by eating chocolate.
Chocolate is vegetable in disguise.
Debate Round No. 1
gg4xwnw

Pro

Well I'm waiting, what about you come with you argument since you're against my debate.
henryzietlow

Con

I would like to observe that you, as pro have the burden of proof. By simply refuting your arguments, I have won this debate.
Your argument revolves around the fact that chocolate in general makes you lose weight. According to sources, chocolate can make you lose weight, but only while eaten in small quantities (1). However, when eaten in larger quantities, these effects are reversed (1). So, by even eating a bar of chocolate a day, the weight loss effects are lost. So, these benefits cannot be weighed for those who eat considerable amounts of chocolate. Furthermore, these benefits apply to chocolate as a whole. The resolution only regards dark chocolate. So, it is clear that the benefits are non unique to this debate, as they apply to chocolate that isn't dark. Because of this, the weight loss benefit cannot be weighed in this debate due to non-uniqueness to the resolution. Furthermore, the affirmative side has given no connection between chocolate consumption and your "boobs being firm." This is another reason why the affirmative argument cannot be weighed.
So, it is clear that the affirmative argument is non-unique, un-resolutional, and cannot even be connected to the very core of this debate.
1- http://healthyeating.sfgate.com...
Debate Round No. 2
gg4xwnw

Pro

gg4xwnw forfeited this round.
henryzietlow

Con

Extend all arguments
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by KonstanBen 2 years ago
KonstanBen
Aff better be thankful for neg's pointing out of burden because it seems as though Aff had a great misunderstanding
Posted by PapaNolan 2 years ago
PapaNolan
I am laughing so hard! This is the biggest troll debate I have ever seen!
Posted by debate_power 2 years ago
debate_power
The hell...
Posted by Circle_Craft 2 years ago
Circle_Craft
What.
Posted by KonstanBen 2 years ago
KonstanBen
wtf is this??!!!!???
Posted by JimmyBoJangles 2 years ago
JimmyBoJangles
Is this even a debate? Obviously it does. No one can argue against you.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
gg4xwnwhenryzietlowTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
gg4xwnwhenryzietlowTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
Vote Placed by KonstanBen 2 years ago
KonstanBen
gg4xwnwhenryzietlowTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to Con due to forfeit by Pro. No obvious spelling/grammar winner. Pro had the BoP and failed to meet it. Con used the only source.