The Instigator
AKSHAT17031515
Pro (for)
The Contender
FollowerofChrist1955
Con (against)

Darwin's Theory: Right Or Wrong

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
AKSHAT17031515 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/23/2018 Category: Education
Updated: 4 weeks ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 316 times Debate No: 106996
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (18)
Votes (0)

 

AKSHAT17031515

Pro

About 6 hrs ago there has been a news that Darwin's Theory is wrong? It says that all apes did not evolve into humans but evolution is due to many factors and occurs only in uncomfortable conditions. Darwin's was even right about the finches in Galapagos islands so why his theory is wrong?
FollowerofChrist1955

Con


Darwin's Theory: Right Or Wrong


ANSWER: WRONG!


The problem lies in the fact that Darwin’s Theory was never correct at onset! We (humanity and the animal Life never evolved, from the primordial ooze!) Thus Science having proven after multiple experiments and billions of dollars in expeditures, that nothing did in fact crawl out of the primordial ooze, eliminated in perpetuity the notion of Darwin’s theory though they are having trouble coming to grips with it?



The hypothesis is easily proven false in that science was never able to produce through all experimentation a product or byproduct that 1. Was Living and 2. Was capable of crawling out of the MICROSCOPIC World to EVOLVE! Therein lays the death knell of evolution.



Try as the scientists might they are guilty of the same thing the government pulls on humanity all the time. State Tax is NOT double taxation because one is civil government and the other is Federal government! See?


In Science’s case … they took adaptation, changed the name to evolution yet it IS the same thing!. Creatures adapt to environment … But science insists on saying species EVOLVE over time to adjust to their environments! It’s the same thing!



Still I know you want to prove evolution but you can’t and nether can any of the other evolutionary believers out there. WHY? Because not a single soul on earth can answer the questions posed. None ever have, none ever will. Instead they come back with talk … simple excuses. Talking abio this or some other matter, but that makes ZERO difference anyhow. Because NO evolution person can show the Animal that came from any process. So we find ourselves back at the same problem. NOTHING crawled out of the primordial ooze to BEGIN EVOLUTION! See the problem? If nothing was created but enzymes, multicellular microscopic organisms DOOMED to REMAIN microscopic, or amino-acids, DOOMED to REMAIN Microscopic, or GENES …. DOOMED to REMAIN microscopic, they just cannot EVOLVE into the world of the living creatures of earth.



So lets nip this in the bud once and for all.. Put it to bed once and for all okay? Everybody play! Answer these questions ONLY in the comments section ... not excuses, not but, but, but! If you can't answer just the questions ... evolution ISN'T TRUE, no matter what excuse you use! Sorry!



1. Name the sentient animal created by evolutionists during experimentation: a Living breathing creature you can HOLD in your hand and see without a microscope!



Answer #1 here:__________________________________.



2: Must have EVOLVED from microbe to a sentient living air breathing, crawling, walking, flying ,egg producing, reproductive animal :



Answer #2 here:__________________________________.



.... because Sentient creatures ARE the recognized Life on earth. Otherwise it's a bacteria, and while they may be a form of life, not a single example of one ever becoming a creature sentient OR otherwise exists in the History of Science.



Medical Definition of Microbe


Microbe: A minute organism typically visible under a microscope. Microbes include bacteria, fungi, and protozoan parasites.




3. Name the scientist and the experiment that SUCCESSFULLY produced that specific sentient Life form.



Answer #3 here:__________________________________.



4. Name a single animal that changed from one species to a completely different species in history that IS 100% proveable!



Answer #4 here:__________________________________.



Like dog to fish, bird to lizard, elephant to flea, ape to Man, pig to dog, must be 100% factual OR it CANNOT BE CALLED TRUE as defined by dictionary.



To prove this IS a proven fact. Answer just the questions! Otherwise leave it blank and let this debate expire because the excuses? Are just that! Excuses! IF you cannot answer these then evolution IS FALSE! Because for evolution to HAVE BEGUNsomething MUST HAVE CRAWLED OUT of the primordial ooze and that HAS been proven impossible by hard scientific fact. We managed, bacteria, microorganism, multicellular microscopic organisms, amino-acids (microscopic) Genes (microscopic), but NOTHING you can hold in your hand or SEE with the naked eye that could become animal life!



If you come back with anything but the answers themselves … it PROVES I’m right .. no one can answer the questions. And that too resolves the debate! Proving beyond all doubt evolution cannot be true, because it was incapable of creating LIFE that evolves from ooze to creature!



But don’t feel bad, I didn’t know this till either till God showed it to me!



Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
18 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by FollowerofChrist1955 3 weeks ago
FollowerofChrist1955
TheMarketLibertarian;
Prokaryotes are organisms without a cell nucleus, or indeed any other membrane-bound organelles, in most cases unicellular (in rare cases, multicellular)

Raise your hand if humanity OR animal, or insect Life IS A Prokaryotes?

Then TheMarketLibertarian is deliberately delusional willing to accept any excuse to "NOT" have to look for God! Dude completely unnecessary. You have the RIGHT to CHOOSE Hell without giving us excuses!
Be well, may the force and stuff like that ...
Posted by TheMarketLibertarian 3 weeks ago
TheMarketLibertarian
"The hypothesis is easily proven false in that science was never able to produce through all experimentation a product or byproduct that 1. Was Living and 2. Was capable of crawling out of the MICROSCOPIC World to EVOLVE! Therein lays the death knell of evolution."

Actually that's false- they were able to have simple prokaryokes develop from basic chemicals in a sterile environment, and yes, evolution has been observed. Whenever they have to come out with a new flu shot to develop immunity against a more recent strain of the flu, that is evolution at work.
Posted by FollowerofChrist1955 3 weeks ago
FollowerofChrist1955
EmeryP;
Hey, look lying isn"t necessary, you were played as a sucker ... we get it! Re-read your statement, you attempted to use abiogenesis, exccept abiogenesis, also has produced no living creatures from nothing. So Evolution cannot be the origin of squat! See the problem? So no Evolution. Its called and has always been called adaption and it has nothing to do with the Origin of Life.

God remains the only rational thought, answers all questions, but also demonstrates the horrors of reality, that billions ARE now in, or waiting to GO to Hell, for WILLFUL REJECTION of their Creator!
Tragic, yes, JUST? Yes ... it is just!
Posted by EmeryP 3 weeks ago
EmeryP
Evolution isn't a question, it's an observation. Life changes.
Posted by FollowerofChrist1955 3 weeks ago
FollowerofChrist1955
Pro.
Again ... no answers because they CANNOT answer them. All they ever do is come back with off subject excuses.

So the answer is now known ... DARWIN ... is, was and will always BE WRONG!
Posted by EmeryP 3 weeks ago
EmeryP
Natural Selection is observed, not reasoned. Even if we didn't accept Natural selection, that wouldn't discount that we observe it to occur.

Life's Origins are covered the Theory of Abiogenesis. Why we observe changes in life is covered by Evolution. These are separate theories.

It would be much easier to reject Evolution if you were able to offer a comprehensive replacement, as the entire field of Biology would be invalidated. You would need to build Biology from the ground up, and without a replacement which makes at least Equal sense as Evolution, you likely aren't going to be taken seriously.
Posted by WOLF.J 4 weeks ago
WOLF.J
Con is Pathetic and lonely, i pity him. God bless his mother for such a horrible human she raised.
Posted by WOLF.J 4 weeks ago
WOLF.J
Like I said buddy, you will not get a rise out of me, continue with your bashful ways, we'll see how god deals with you. I have not even said anything about my stance on god, I have only discussed your poor debate etiquette, which you continue to prove.. You continue to insult and insult. I know what i'm doing in life, are you? I doubt it, why else would you be on here putting other people down. A healthy, happy, religious man would never disrespect a fellow being. Such is your Ignorance and disgrace. You are abomination of a human, GOOD DAY ONCE AGAIN.
Posted by FollowerofChrist1955 4 weeks ago
FollowerofChrist1955
WOLF.J ;
See? clueless! I rest my case. You know you COULD have just not said anything? But that would have been the WISE thing to do.

You flaunt your ignorance then become upset when called out on it! The wise who had nothing to say ... like you did, would simply have moved on, not caring the words of others? But not you? Your cursed of God. This is why you MUST wander the Religious sites of the Web. Hearing of your doom, Forced to read scriptures each time But remaining completely in the DARK? This God says TO YOU:

Isaiah 6
9 He said, "Go, and tell this people: 'Keep on listening, but do not perceive; Keep on looking, but do not understand.' 10 "Render the hearts of this people insensitive, Their ears dull, And their eyes dim, Otherwise they might see with their eyes, Hear with their ears, Understand with their hearts, And return and be healed.""

you are accursed for your rejection, though seeing you cannot perceive though reading you Cannot understand! Go then lick your wounds and await you death and FEAR! Hell is a place of FLAME and TORMENT! It ... awaits you, sadly by your OWN choice!
Posted by WOLF.J 4 weeks ago
WOLF.J
Yep you are definitely a troll with some personal issues. I bet you are some lonely nerd looking for a fight. I'm not going to stoop to your idiotic level, I've seen your debates, all you do is pis people off. Good day troll.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.