The Instigator
Baker532
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Raneyday
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

Death Penalty

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Raneyday
Voting Style: Judge Point System: Select Winner
Started: 9/22/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 383 times Debate No: 79993
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)

 

Baker532

Pro

This House supports Lethal Injection as a penalty for Murder in the first and second degree, if so chosen by judge or jury.
Raneyday

Con

Yes, the death penalty is accepted as treatment or actions of taking care of people who commit crimes for good. However, I feel killing them for their crimes is getting them out of their punishment, as the real punishment is to be locked away. Meaning being killed would give them the easy way out of their life punishment.
Debate Round No. 1
Baker532

Pro

Though 50 years ago, this may have been true, it is not in this day and age. Many prisons are accommodated with xbox live, wifi, and cable television. To me, this doesn't seem much of a punishment for premeditated murder.
Raneyday

Con

Yes, I agree that they have more luxuries than that of about fifty years ago. However, even though they do have these luxuries, they are still locked away and kept from freedom. Furthermore, depending on their crimes, record of emotional issues, etc, is what regulates who gets these luxuries. If charged with manslaughter and/ or any other crime that may result in a life sentence, these luxuries are regulated or just taken away from these type of prisoners. Meaning they do still have punishment enough at terms of prison, not death. Death is the easy way out in this case, which means they deserve to be locked up their entire life. Not just sent out of it.
Debate Round No. 2
Baker532

Pro

The amount of access to certain luxuries in prison does not vary depending on the type of crime committed. Murders have the same types of entertainment as rapists, thieves, and arsonists.
Raneyday

Con

I would have to disagree. Depending on sentence and actions towards others is what determines luxuries. Some prisoners who are not friendly towards others, or cause frequent disruptions, may be sent to solitary confinement, thus causing their luxuries to be taken away. Luxuries are a privilege, not a right.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Raneyday 1 year ago
Raneyday
I am in agreement for the death penalty, just was chosen as the debator against it. So I really have to think what the other side would say.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
It's probably a good idea to withdraw the challenge from me :P I was planning on trolling you anyway.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
Me too, I'm just going to negate the specific resolution.
Posted by Baker532 1 year ago
Baker532
A year ago, it cost the Texas Department of Criminal Justice approximately $83 to execute an inmate by lethal injection, the American-Statesman reported last month. That price has risen to nearly $1,300. Expensive, but not quite one million dollars.
Posted by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
I support the death penalty.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
I'm in support of using the 30 cent bullet to the brain stem as opposed to the million dollar injection.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
Baker532Raneyday
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: It would have been helpful for either side to actually support their assertions rather than just making them, but given the circumstances, it's really just a question of which is worse: the death penalty or life imprisonment. Pro never argues how the death penalty is worse beyond stating that there's no luxuries involved, though access to luxuries becomes a bit of a he said/she said situation. Only Con actually explains any real harm to either scenario, and that's harm to life imprisonment. By the end, I'm left viewing death as an easy out, and life imprisonment as at least an opportunity for punishment. Ergo, I vote Con.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
Baker532Raneyday
Who won the debate:-Vote Checkmark
Reasons for voting decision: This mainly turned out to be a yes/no debate, but I'm going to have to give this debate to Con. Neither side used sources which would have greatly helped their arguments and give them more weight especially when it came to the back half of the debate. Con brought up more harms and that the life in prison is a harsher term and taking the death penalty is taking the "easy way out." Pro does gain the S&G points since Con made several noticable grammatical errors such as fragments. With the finial score being 3-1, Con wins the debate.