The Instigator
RamboLegacy
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
kasmic
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

Death Penalty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
kasmic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/12/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 11 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 333 times Debate No: 82495
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

RamboLegacy

Pro

I am pro for the death penalty. I believe that the people who have done heinous crimes deserve to be put down. They do not belong in the world. Challenge me! you won't be able to defeat me.
kasmic

Con

C1: The right to life

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men”

As quoted above, The general consensus in the U.S. is that the primary function of government is to secure people’s rights. Some of which are unalienable. In the United States, life is considered an unalienable right. This is evident by the quote above taken from the Declaration of Independence.

How is it that the State can function as a securer of the individual right to life while simultaneously taking a person’s life? Simply put, it cannot. The State does have the right to remove those who violate other’s rights from society. However, the State has no legitimate cause to take away one’s unalienable right to life. This is true even for the worst individuals imaginable. For the State to take one’s life via capital punishment is for the State to function contrary to its primary purpose. Life as a right should remain unalienable.

C2: Innocents

At least 18 people have been wrongly executed. 18 people have had their unalienable right to life taken from them unjustly. (1) What cost is my opponent willing to pay for so called justice that she is willing to endorse the unjust action of the state taking people’s lives.

C3: Cost

Trying a death penalty case and the process of carrying it out cost significantly more than life in prison. (2)

“the enhanced cost of trying a death penalty case is at least $1.25 million more than trying a comparable murder case resulting in a sentence of life in prison without parole.” (3)

C4: A reasonable alternative

“In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

The sentence is cheaper to tax-payers and keeps violent offenders off the streets for good. Unlike the death penalty, a sentence of Life Without Parole also allows mistakes to be corrected.” (4)

Overview:

The Death Penalty is more expensive than the alternative. Innocent people have been and likely will be executed. The States involvement in the death penalty is contrary to the purpose of government and infringes on unalienable rights. Life in prison without parole is a reasonable, cost effective alternative to the death penalty that gives the desired result without the potential harm the Death Penalty does.

Due to the inherent harm of the death penalty and reasonable alternatives, the Death penalty should be abolished.

Sources

(1) http://www.deathpenalty.org...
(2) http://www.forbes.com...
(3) http://deathpenalty.org...
(4) http://www.deathpenalty.org...

Debate Round No. 1
RamboLegacy

Pro

RamboLegacy forfeited this round.
kasmic

Con

extended.
Debate Round No. 2
RamboLegacy

Pro

RamboLegacy forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Robkwoods 1 year ago
Robkwoods
Damn, I can't believe this didn't finish. Con had some great points but the pro could have definitely rebutted a few of them.

Yeah but through due process those inalienable rights can be taken away, you know just like they were from the rest of the individuals in lockup. The Cost of LWOP and Death argument is common, there is data to support both sides. Yes it is terrible that innocents would be put to death. Is that 18 people a year, since the inception of justice; that number has no context.

So yeah, sad this didn't play out.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Death23 11 months ago
Death23
RamboLegacykasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 11 months ago
dsjpk5
RamboLegacykasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff many times, so conduct to Con.