The Instigator
JamN
Pro (for)
The Contender
fire_wings
Con (against)

Debate 1

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
fire_wings has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/11/2016 Category: Economics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 411 times Debate No: 97926
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

JamN

Pro

wewwwwwwwww
fire_wings

Con

You are wrong. This is debate number 97926. Debate 1 is: http://www.debate.org...

And, also this is not your first debate or my first debate. So in either way, this cannot be debate 1.
Debate Round No. 1
JamN

Pro

Debate 1 is a title therfore it can be used anywere
fire_wings

Con

no, and you showed no burden of proof. I have showed that this cannot be debate #1
Debate Round No. 2
JamN

Pro

who cares
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.