The Instigator
Mikal
Pro (for)
Winning
21 Points
The Contender
WhoWouldnt
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Debate Roulette/Random Debate Challenge

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Mikal
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/19/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 702 times Debate No: 46283
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

Mikal

Pro

So this is how this will go. I am going to go to this site

http://idebate.org...

I will scroll through this list as fast as I possibly can. So fast that there will be no way for me to judge what this lands on. Whatever topic it lands on I am pro, the person whom agrees to take this will be con


There is no way to know what this debate will be about. I will also screenshot me doing this so there is no questions about me doing it fairly



Rounds are as follows

Me

Round 1 : Rules
Round 2 : Picking the debate, and posting the resolution
Round 3 : Contentions
Round 4 : Rebuttals, Rebuilding Contentions, Closing statements

Adversary

Round 1 : Acknowledgement
Round 2 : Acceptance of resolution and first first initial contentions and building points
Round 3 : Rebuttals , Rebuilding Contentions , Closing statements
Round 4 : Shall type no round as agreed upon

Rules

[1] Failure from my adversary to type "no round as agreed upon" in the last round will result in a full 7 point drop due to him/her having an extra round
[2] FFS shall result in the loss of a conduct point, while multiple FFS shall possibly result in a full 7 point drop at the discretion of the judges
[3] No trolling or semantics. Serious debate
WhoWouldnt

Con

I'll admit, this is quite nerve wracking. I'm nervous and excited...Nervecited! (I'm going to assume that during the actual debate rounds I have to be 100% serious and I don't get to make up words, lol)

I hope not to disappoint and look forward to this debate:

Game on!
Debate Round No. 1
Mikal

Pro

Resolution - The house believes Cannabis should be legalized

First time I have ever been pro on this in my history of DDO lol

http://gyazo.com...

Best of luck on this debate and you thank you for accepting.
WhoWouldnt

Con

I would like to apologize to Mikal, I seem to have be taking too much time on this site for my currently busy schedule. I hereby forfeit this debate and request all voters give Mikal the victory. I simply do not have enough time to debate this topic properly and give it the attention it deserves. Within the next few hours I'll be deactivating my account and will most likely be back in the summer for a short time.

I did like this roulette debate idea and I hope he gets a chance to debate someone truly skilled. Best of luck to you in the future.

-WhoWouldn't
Debate Round No. 2
Mikal

Pro

thank you for the concession.
WhoWouldnt

Con

Please read the concession in round 2.

I concede and all votes should go to Mikal (Pro) for this debate.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Mikal 3 years ago
Mikal
would you mind just posting concession throughout the debate, so i can expedite the voting
Posted by WhoWouldnt 3 years ago
WhoWouldnt
Sorry, this was a bit anticlimactic but I really am quite busy lately and didn't realize my schedule would turn out this way. I appreciate the community that is here and will most likely be back when things slow down.
Posted by Jonbonbon 3 years ago
Jonbonbon
I wanna stay posted
Posted by GodChoosesLife 3 years ago
GodChoosesLife
This should be interesting.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
MikalWhoWouldntTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
MikalWhoWouldntTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession
Vote Placed by PotBelliedGeek 3 years ago
PotBelliedGeek
MikalWhoWouldntTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: All points to pro. Con conceded the debate.