Debate chicks are attractive

Debate chicks are attractive.

Resolved: the majority of "debate Chicks" are either nerds with acne, social disorders and self esteem issues, or they take the opposing side of being inmodest, rude and "too social" their are only about 10 % of "debate chicks" that are normal girls with regular issues. (This is not to say that girls in debate are worse than boys in debate. In fact, the boys in debate face the same percentages and issues.) Please understand that there are "normal girls" in debate, but the majority is the issue and the main voter in this debate. Therefore, because their personality and physical looks are generally flawed, "debate Chicks" are unattractive.

My opponent says that debate chicks are unattractive. My opponent obviously does not like the majority of debate chicks. My opponent is rude, and cruel to this girls by saying they're "nerds with acne, social disorders and self-esteem issues." Female voters should vote AGAINST Con, due to the fact he is being sexist. He does not appreciate the fact that debate girls are beautiful, wonderful, and attractive. I suspect my opponent is homosexual. He brought up boys in debate, although the resolution clearly states "Debate Chicks."

My opponent first states that I do not like "debate chicks." However, I do like 10 % of debate chicks, just not the other 90%. The 90% is the main voter in this debate. My next point that he brought up was that I was a "sexist". However, the resolution is "Debate chicks are attractive" I would like to point out that he reffered to the females as "chicks" this is a very sexist term for females. It is demeaning and encourages negative behaviour towards females. I simply said that the majority of females participating in debates are "nerds with acne, social disorders and self-esteem issues." I said this because it is correct, it is a fact. The reason that i mentioned that boys face the same issues, is because it is true. I was simply stating that not only the girls have these problems but the guys do too. The reason I mentioned this is so that the girls would not feel as if I was targeting them as the problem with debate, but simply saying that all persons have this problem. In conclusion to my statment, I am straight, read my profile. My opponent just has no real arguments, so he had to make false accusations to sway away from the topic.

My opponent says he likes 10%. that is incredibly selective. My opponent (in saying that he likes 10%) is 10% agreeing with me. The Con side, is supposed to completely disagree or contradict the Pro side.

In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary, 'chick' is considered the young of any bird, OR A GIRL/WOMAN. By saying chick, I'm merely using correct terminology.

"The reason that I mentioned that boys face the same issues, is because it is true"
I ask my opponent, what evidence do you have on this?

"In conclusion to my statement, I am straight, read my profile"
I personally know my opponent, and I know for a fact that he is white-Caucasian and is LDS (although on his profile, he said he was a black Jew). If he lied on those details, what is to stop him from lying on the issue of his sexuality.

"The reason I mentioned this is so that the girls would not feel as if I was targeting them as the problem with debate, but simply saying that all persons have this problem."
I am not targeting debate girls in a negative way. in fact, quite the opposite. I am saying that debate girls are attractive. Never once did I say anything bad about debate girls.

My opponent clearly does not understand the issue at hand, and I ask that his 'arguments' be discarded and ignored.

I have proved that debate girls are attractive through multiple details.
1)Debate chicks are attractive. (Round 1-Pro)
2)He does not appreciate the fact that debate girls are beautiful, wonderful, and attractive. (Round 2-Pro)

Vote Pro, due to the fact that my opponent is clearly against debate girls.
Thank You

"chicks" is a slang word for a female. I am black, why would i debate somebody that i know? Why does he slander my good name by claiming that he knows me. My opponent clearly has no real arguments as i have previously stated, this is why he makes things up and claimes that he knows me. I am straight, and bringing up sexuality during a debate is very rude and uncalled for anyways.

dictionary.com defines chick as:

1.–noun 1. a young chicken or other bird.
2. a child.
3. Slang: Often Offensive. a girl or young woman.

Defenition 3
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This word in and of itself is rude and cruel, therefore he cannot say anything about my personal integrity because he, the one who wrote the resolution, already claims that he thinks females are worth less than the general public. I have proved my case that the majority of debate "chicks" are not attractive, and also shown that their is no connection between my opponent and I.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------