The Instigator
bookwormbill111
Pro (for)
Losing
39 Points
The Contender
joshowosho
Con (against)
Winning
42 Points

Debate chicks are attractive

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 16 votes the winner is...
joshowosho
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/6/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,268 times Debate No: 6806
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (16)

 

bookwormbill111

Pro

Debate chicks are attractive.
joshowosho

Con

Resolved: the majority of "debate Chicks" are either nerds with acne, social disorders and self esteem issues, or they take the opposing side of being inmodest, rude and "too social" their are only about 10 % of "debate chicks" that are normal girls with regular issues. (This is not to say that girls in debate are worse than boys in debate. In fact, the boys in debate face the same percentages and issues.) Please understand that there are "normal girls" in debate, but the majority is the issue and the main voter in this debate. Therefore, because their personality and physical looks are generally flawed, "debate Chicks" are unattractive.
Debate Round No. 1
bookwormbill111

Pro

My opponent says that debate chicks are unattractive. My opponent obviously does not like the majority of debate chicks. My opponent is rude, and cruel to this girls by saying they're "nerds with acne, social disorders and self-esteem issues." Female voters should vote AGAINST Con, due to the fact he is being sexist. He does not appreciate the fact that debate girls are beautiful, wonderful, and attractive. I suspect my opponent is homosexual. He brought up boys in debate, although the resolution clearly states "Debate Chicks."
joshowosho

Con

My opponent first states that I do not like "debate chicks." However, I do like 10 % of debate chicks, just not the other 90%. The 90% is the main voter in this debate. My next point that he brought up was that I was a "sexist". However, the resolution is "Debate chicks are attractive" I would like to point out that he reffered to the females as "chicks" this is a very sexist term for females. It is demeaning and encourages negative behaviour towards females. I simply said that the majority of females participating in debates are "nerds with acne, social disorders and self-esteem issues." I said this because it is correct, it is a fact. The reason that i mentioned that boys face the same issues, is because it is true. I was simply stating that not only the girls have these problems but the guys do too. The reason I mentioned this is so that the girls would not feel as if I was targeting them as the problem with debate, but simply saying that all persons have this problem. In conclusion to my statment, I am straight, read my profile. My opponent just has no real arguments, so he had to make false accusations to sway away from the topic.
Debate Round No. 2
bookwormbill111

Pro

My opponent says he likes 10%. that is incredibly selective. My opponent (in saying that he likes 10%) is 10% agreeing with me. The Con side, is supposed to completely disagree or contradict the Pro side.

In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary, 'chick' is considered the young of any bird, OR A GIRL/WOMAN. By saying chick, I'm merely using correct terminology.

"The reason that I mentioned that boys face the same issues, is because it is true"
I ask my opponent, what evidence do you have on this?

"In conclusion to my statement, I am straight, read my profile"
I personally know my opponent, and I know for a fact that he is white-Caucasian and is LDS (although on his profile, he said he was a black Jew). If he lied on those details, what is to stop him from lying on the issue of his sexuality.

"The reason I mentioned this is so that the girls would not feel as if I was targeting them as the problem with debate, but simply saying that all persons have this problem."
I am not targeting debate girls in a negative way. in fact, quite the opposite. I am saying that debate girls are attractive. Never once did I say anything bad about debate girls.

My opponent clearly does not understand the issue at hand, and I ask that his 'arguments' be discarded and ignored.

I have proved that debate girls are attractive through multiple details.
1)Debate chicks are attractive. (Round 1-Pro)
2)He does not appreciate the fact that debate girls are beautiful, wonderful, and attractive. (Round 2-Pro)

Vote Pro, due to the fact that my opponent is clearly against debate girls.
Thank You
joshowosho

Con

"chicks" is a slang word for a female. I am black, why would i debate somebody that i know? Why does he slander my good name by claiming that he knows me. My opponent clearly has no real arguments as i have previously stated, this is why he makes things up and claimes that he knows me. I am straight, and bringing up sexuality during a debate is very rude and uncalled for anyways.

dictionary.com defines chick as:

1.–noun 1. a young chicken or other bird.
2. a child.
3. Slang: Often Offensive. a girl or young woman.

Defenition 3
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This word in and of itself is rude and cruel, therefore he cannot say anything about my personal integrity because he, the one who wrote the resolution, already claims that he thinks females are worth less than the general public. I have proved my case that the majority of debate "chicks" are not attractive, and also shown that their is no connection between my opponent and I.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Bjork-Taco 8 years ago
Bjork-Taco
so this is what you two do in debate instead of working on your policy, but dont vote for bookwormbill111 cause he sniffs sharpies.
Posted by fresnoinvasion 8 years ago
fresnoinvasion
If the con would have argued showing maybe a LITTLE intelligence I may have felt compelled to vote for him.
Posted by jakatak 8 years ago
jakatak
Sorry, bookwormbill, but joshowosho kinda beat you. But it helps that I agreed with him in the first place. Better luck next time.
Posted by sadolite 8 years ago
sadolite
Providing pictures would have helped pros position immensely!!
Posted by Ragaxus 8 years ago
Ragaxus
"The Con side, is supposed to completely disagree or contradict the Pro side."

Lrn2conditional affirmation, n00b.
Posted by HeedMyFeed 8 years ago
HeedMyFeed
I would vote pro, just because of the pure hilarity of his statements.
Posted by RennAmethyst 8 years ago
RennAmethyst
Haha, wow. Just wow.
Posted by mystearica007 8 years ago
mystearica007
I take offense to this. xD
I'm not ugly, or covered in acne or whatever.
Men need to get lives.
Posted by bookwormbill111 8 years ago
bookwormbill111
I am appalled and flabbergasted joshowosho. I did not slander your name, I was merely stating facts.

Your name is Josh Waters.
You attend Salem Hills High School.
You are white, straight, LDS, and you are very popular with the ladies.

These are facts. I was stating facts, not slandering your name.
I apologize, if that's what it seemed like.

I did not say anything mean, cruel, or derogatory about girls except for calling them 'chicks.' I admit, that probably wasn't the best word choice. My apologies.
Posted by PoeJoe 8 years ago
PoeJoe
Conduct goes to CON because PRO tried to slander CON.
Everything else is tied.
16 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by steelman 8 years ago
steelman
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Bjork-Taco 8 years ago
Bjork-Taco
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by bookwormbill111 8 years ago
bookwormbill111
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Bboo 8 years ago
Bboo
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by redsoxfreak010 8 years ago
redsoxfreak010
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by dura_to_the_max 8 years ago
dura_to_the_max
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by tyhunt99 8 years ago
tyhunt99
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Vote Placed by fresnoinvasion 8 years ago
fresnoinvasion
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by JcSly 8 years ago
JcSly
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Vote Placed by jakatak 8 years ago
jakatak
bookwormbill111joshowoshoTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04