The Instigator
Rabadash
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points
The Contender
Calvincambridge
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points

Debate.org does not exist

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/5/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 851 times Debate No: 18184
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (6)
Votes (7)

 

Rabadash

Con

My opponent will argue that debate.org does not exist. My opponent will begin with opening arguments.
Calvincambridge

Pro

OK here we go Debate.org does exist

A if it dident exist we couldent have this debate
B there are records of it
C It is known by people therefore it exists

You have the burden of proof
Debate Round No. 1
Rabadash

Con

Rabadash forfeited this round.
Calvincambridge

Pro

You have no proof it dosent exist
Debate Round No. 2
Rabadash

Con

Rabadash forfeited this round.
Calvincambridge

Pro

could we debate now
Debate Round No. 3
Rabadash

Con

Rabadash forfeited this round.
Calvincambridge

Pro

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Calvincambridge 5 years ago
Calvincambridge
I actually dident know when I accepted it but I couldent argue it dident exist so I kept arguing the resolution.
Posted by Double_R 5 years ago
Double_R
Agreed. I think I should instigate a challenge to him as Con just to get an easy victory. Think he would figure it out by then?
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
@Double_R, I guess we should vote Con, because despite Con forfeiting, Pro made his case for him.
Posted by Double_R 5 years ago
Double_R
Now this is really interesting. How do we vote on this one?
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
Hahaha, I know! I want to challenge CalvinCambridge on a serious debate just for the laughs!
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
Pro is arguing the wrong side.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: my brain exploded...
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Calvin, did you know that you were supposed to debate that Debate.org DOESN'T exist? or were you just confusing this debate with that of another?
Vote Placed by Double_R 5 years ago
Double_R
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: The resolution states that Debate.org does not exist, yet Pro argues that it does exists. How can I vote anything else but Con?
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made Con's case for him. Debate.org does not does not exist, so Con wins.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 5 years ago
socialpinko
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for forfeits. Arguments to Con because Pro refuted his own position.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 5 years ago
BlackVoid
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: What Thett said.
Vote Placed by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
RabadashCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: No one deserves to win this debate.