The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against) should not require us to complete three debates before we can vote.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
bjoh249 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/2/2016 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 318 times Debate No: 96652
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




I just signed up for this site because I first want to vote on some debates. I shouldn't have to make three debates first.


The three debates rule, while inconvenient, is extremely necessary for this site. Three debates isn't so hard a task, but it really helps. For starters, the vote moderators have their hands full with all the current reported votes, and removing this rule would add significantly to that burden. And if you consider that the votes by people with three debates or more already have a large chance of breaking the rules, you can imagine that people with less debates are going to have an even higher chance. This just isn't worth the moderator's time, too few good votes are gained for too much work.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.