The Instigator
DATXDUDE
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
Tough
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

Debating Seminar

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Tough
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/7/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 415 times Debate No: 79495
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)

 

DATXDUDE

Pro

I have re enstated this debate. WHATEVER ARGUMENT YOU WANT TO MAKE, I WILL CRITIQUE IT, BUT NOT DEBATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ARGUMENT.
Tough

Con

I believe that the only reason to hate and despise Hitler is that he didn't finish the job.

Jews still remain and the whole world isn't speaking German. He failed and that's a pathetic thing for someone with his intelligence and level of motivation to have done.

He perhaps could have worked out a way to still win it if he let the people take him in as a war criminal but he chose to p***y out and killed himself first.

Of all his traits up until the failure, he was a brave guy with serious resistance to peer pressure and criticism. His failure to finish betrayed his reputation and the traits he'd shown up until that point.
Debate Round No. 1
DATXDUDE

Pro

I know you're trolling me but I guess I'll critique your argument anyways to win this debate. (Obviously, your argument is retarded and anti semetic.)

You didn't speak formally enough the third round. You also didn't explain why what Hitler did was good.



By the way, you aren't tough, bruh.
Tough

Con

Tough forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
DATXDUDE

Pro

I extend all arguments.
Tough

Con

Win this debate? In round 1 you specifically say you re-instated it and the first time you made it you specified 'no votes, this is for fun'.
http://www.debate.org...

How about I critique your critique? You said 'third round' but my debate was in the first round. The rest of your critique was subjective in every way.

There is no winner here because neither was debating the other, get over it.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: imabench// Mod action: NOT Removed<

1 points to Pro (Conduct). Neither side produced any coherent argument whatsoever (partially because the original debate resolution itself was just as nonsensical) but the forfeited round in round two is an automatic forfeit of conduct points.

[*Reason for non-removal*] A forfeit is sufficient reasoning to award conduct points.
************************************************************************
Posted by Tough 1 year ago
Tough
also incoherence has to be justified, you can't just say you cant understand and get away with it.
Posted by Tough 1 year ago
Tough
actually there is no difference if i forfeit or say 'i skip this round' so that's ridiculous.
Posted by DATXDUDE 1 year ago
DATXDUDE
No, because you forfeited, and this breaks rules of conduct.
Posted by Tough 1 year ago
Tough
bench's vote was equally stupid
Posted by DATXDUDE 1 year ago
DATXDUDE
I said Con's ARGUMENT was retarded tajshar.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
DATXDUDEToughTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro called Con retarded, and Pro's grammar and spelling was very bad.
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
imabench
DATXDUDEToughTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side produced any coherent argument whatsoever (partially because the original debate resolution itself was just as nonsensical) but the forfeited round in round two is an automatic forfeit of conduct points.