The Instigator
Delirious
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
anarcholibertyman
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Debating Should have a third "Gray Area" Party

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/1/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 729 times Debate No: 15752
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Delirious

Pro

Overview: More often than not debating is a just a black and white, and more often than not there is some sort of gray area that people do believe. For example when it comes to abortion, some people are completely for abortion others are completely against it. Then there are those people who believe that abortion is only fine in certain situations (ex. if the mother's health is at stake.) So my point is I believe that Debating should have a third party to represent this "gray area."

So I will wait for my opponent to respond first and I will create an appropriate rebuttal.
anarcholibertyman

Con

To your example about abortion, one can simply adjust the resolution to state that 'abortion is wrong in all cases except rape'. There is no need to have a gray area. I will pass the debate on back to my opponent.
Debate Round No. 1
Delirious

Pro

Delirious forfeited this round.
anarcholibertyman

Con

Extend my argument.
Debate Round No. 2
Delirious

Pro

Delirious forfeited this round.
anarcholibertyman

Con

anarcholibertyman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Delirious

Pro

Delirious forfeited this round.
anarcholibertyman

Con

anarcholibertyman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Delirious

Pro

I would like to first apologize for absence, as I was unable to respond due important engagements (Finals.) So if wish to start a new debate simply message me.
anarcholibertyman

Con

I would also like to apologize as I actually forfot about this site and then remembered that I had like three debates going on.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Sniperjake1994 6 years ago
Sniperjake1994
change the round and voting time limit
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
DeliriousanarcholibertymanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides forfeited.