Debators should not vote in his or her own debate...

In debate.org, there are hundreds of debates being made everyday. Many times, people can not view every debate. Most of the time, a debators vote will be what mostly affects the results of the debate.

Therefore, debators will vote for themselves and most likely win. This is not morally correct. The debator who votes for himself just wants to win.

I stand in the CON position for this debate.

This is what I will say for now
-If both debaters vote for themselves in the voting period of a debate, they will then be tied and it will not affect the outcome of the debate at all.

-Also, there are certain instances when a debater votes against themselves
http://www.debate.org...
CoronerPerry says-

After I accepted the challenge is when I realized how right my opponent truly was heck, I even voted for him.

Rebuttal-
"Many times, people can not view every debate."
True, personally I have not read every debate on this website.

"a debaters vote will be what mostly affects the results of the debate."
Refuted by my reasoning. No affect.

"debaters will vote for themselves and most likely win."
Refuted by my reasoning. Nope, tied.

"This is not morally correct."
Define morally, because I assure you that my morals are very much different than yours.

"The debater who votes for himself just wants to win."
Yes.

This is all I will say for the time being.

Your turn...

As for the second round I will just say that October 8th I am going to the ANBERLIN concert!!!! along with Scary Kids Scaring Kids, at the Saltair. (anberlin is the band that is my avatar)

And of course...
Extend my arguments.

Vote in the CON position because my opponent has forfeited.
And yes I am going to vote on this debate.

Thank you.