The Instigator
dschif90
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
mikeymiller12
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Democracy in the Middle East

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/17/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 534 times Debate No: 42536
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

dschif90

Pro

The United States has a long history of supporting autocracy/dictatorship in the Middle East. The belief has been that a strong dictator that is friendly to the United States is more beneficial to regional stability and US national security interests than the uncertainty, instability, and chaos that might stem from a democratically elected government. Other arguments hold that democracy in the region simply cannot work.

Most arguments concerning democracy vs. other forms of governance always seem to focus on the moral aspects of the discussion. I would instead like to focus on the real and tangible impact of the type of government on the stability of the Middle East and on US national security.

My argument is that democracy can indeed work in the region and that it will have a direct and positive impact on regional stability and US national security interests.
mikeymiller12

Con

I believe that a Democratic government enacted upon a foreign nation would not work for the positive. For years other countries have worked and run efficiently without democracy, so why can't they remain that way? China, Japan, and many other nations are defined as a republic, but some like China are governed by communist parties. But those nations run smoothly and some say have been more progressive than the United States. They have brought in more revenue, don't have attacks on their nations, and are steadily growing from an economic standpoint. Also, the people are happy, and not spending billions on war. My point being, those nations are fine without a Democratic influence, as long as the leaders are not corrupt.
Debate Round No. 1
dschif90

Pro

dschif90 forfeited this round.
mikeymiller12

Con

mikeymiller12 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
dschif90

Pro

dschif90 forfeited this round.
mikeymiller12

Con

mikeymiller12 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
dschif90

Pro

dschif90 forfeited this round.
mikeymiller12

Con

mikeymiller12 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
dschif90

Pro

dschif90 forfeited this round.
mikeymiller12

Con

mikeymiller12 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.