The Instigator
arifaliansari.ansari
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Pro (for)
Winning
26 Points

Democracy in the contemporary world has become an obligation for all countries to adopt

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/12/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,151 times Debate No: 42217
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

arifaliansari.ansari

Con

Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens participate equally"either directly or through elected representatives"in the proposal, development, and creation of laws. It encompasses social, economic and cultural conditions that enable the free and equal practice of political self-determination.
STALIN

Pro

Con provides no arguments [1]. He simply presents some definitions.

I argue that all countries should apply democracy and have democracy control their government.

This is because:

A) God gave humans free will.

B) Democracy must be adopted in order to advance a country.

C) Democracy is only fair for individuals in society.

D) Democracy is vital for a good government.

E) People will only truly support a democracy.

D) All other governments are lies.

E) Democracy is vital for the proletariat.

F) People demand freedom.

G) People have every right to freedom.

Sources:
http://www.merriam-webster.com...
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Tophatdoc 3 years ago
Tophatdoc
arifaliansari.ansariSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: The Con side failed to prove their case. The Pro side asserted why democracy should be applied in most of the world with seveal of their points.
Vote Placed by AndrewB686 3 years ago
AndrewB686
arifaliansari.ansariSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't understand the reasoning of con. Why start a debate with only 1 round and use it solely for the explanation of what democracy consists of. Although I entirely disagree with pro, he wins the debate.
Vote Placed by ej3467273 3 years ago
ej3467273
arifaliansari.ansariSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't even argue.
Vote Placed by Gs325jcbd 3 years ago
Gs325jcbd
arifaliansari.ansariSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didnt really give any "good" things to support.
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
arifaliansari.ansariSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con literally didnt even give an argument, which in a 1 round debate is practically suicide